Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Modell zur Ermittlung des Erhaltungsaufwandes von Kunst- und Kulturgütern in kommunalen Bilanzen

Contents:

Author Info

  • Held, Bärbel
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Dieser Beitrag untersucht die Möglichkeiten der Bewertung von Kunst- und Kulturgegenständen im neuen doppischen Finanzwesen der Kommunen im Kontext zum Zweck der Bilanzierung und schließt mit einem Modellvorschlag zur Ermittlung des Erhaltungsaufwandes. Die ergebnisorientierte Steuerung und die generationsgerechte Bewirtschaftung stehen im Vordergrund des neuen kommunalen Finanzmanagements. Eine wirtschaftliche Bewertung der bilanziellen Bestandteile ist hierbei wichtig, ob aber auch eine Marktbewertung notwendig ist, wird in diesem Beitrag zur Diskussion gestellt. In Anlehnung an die Methodik der Bewertung immaterieller Vermögensgegenstände der Handelsbilanz nach IFRS wird die Idee nach indikativen Bewertungsmodellen hier für die Kunst weiterverfolgt. Kunst und Kulturgüter in staatlichen Besitz haben keinen Marktzweck sondern besitzen soziale Werte und Funktionen, die es zu erhalten gilt. Hierzu bedarf es der Transparenz über die tatsächlich notwendigen Aufwende zur Substanzerhaltung. -- This contribution examines the possibilities of the appraisal of art in new public accounting system. The result-oriented control and the generation-fair management are the centres of the new public finance management system. An appraisal of assets and debts is importantly, whether in addition, a market evaluation is necessary, in this contribution for discussion is presented. Following the methodology of the appraisal of intangible assets of the commercial balance sheet in IFRS-methods the idea is further pursued according to indicative appraisal models for the art. Art properties in national possession do not have a market purpose separate to possess social values and functions, which it is valid to receive. For this it is necessary to got transparency over spends for preservation of real assets.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/56436/1/689273665.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden (OTH) in its series OTH im Dialog: Weidener Diskussionspapiere with number 16.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 2009
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:hawdps:16

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.oth-aw.de/

    Related research

    Keywords: Kunst- und Kulturgüter; Erhaltungsaufwand; Bilanz; Bewertungsrichtlinien;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hawdps:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.