IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/efisdi/112011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Föderalismus und Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik: Bericht des Konsortiums "Föderalismus und Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik"

Author

Listed:
  • Alecke, Björn
  • Breitfuss, Marija
  • Cremer, Wolfram
  • Hartmann, Christian
  • Lageman, Bernhard
  • Mitze, Timo
  • Peistrup, Matthias
  • Ploder, Michael
  • Rappen, Hermann
  • Rothgang, Michael

Abstract

Die vorliegende Studie setzt sich mit der Frage auseinander, inwieweit die heute in der Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik (F&I-Politik) Deutschlands vorzufindende Arbeitsteilung der Gebietskörperschaften der Erreichung der Ziele dieser Politik förderlich bzw. abträglich ist. Sie orientiert sich hierbei an normativen Effizienzkriterien, die auf Basis der Wohlfahrtsökonomik, insbesondere der ökonomischen Theorie des Föderalismus entwickelt werden, und wendet diese Kriterien auf empirische Falluntersuchungen an. Zentraler Gegenstand der Untersuchung ist dabei zum einen - der Systematik des BMBF folgend - die Projekt- und Ressortforschung, zum anderen die institutionelle Forschungsförderung des Bundes und der Länder. Die Arbeit gründet sich in erheblichem Maße auf Desktop-Analysen zu den relevanten Subthemen. In ergänzender Funktion wurden seitens des Projektteams in begrenztem Umfang auch eigene empirische Erhebungen - mündliche und telefonische Experteninterviews - durchgeführt. Für die Untersuchung der F&I-Programmangebote wurden die einschlägigen Statistiken des BMBF sowie die Förderdatenbank des Bundes herangezogen.

Suggested Citation

  • Alecke, Björn & Breitfuss, Marija & Cremer, Wolfram & Hartmann, Christian & Lageman, Bernhard & Mitze, Timo & Peistrup, Matthias & Ploder, Michael & Rappen, Hermann & Rothgang, Michael, 2011. "Föderalismus und Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik: Bericht des Konsortiums "Föderalismus und Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik"," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 11-2011, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:112011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/156559/1/StuDIS_2011-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Engel & Timo Mitze & Roberto Patuelli & Janina Reinkowski, 2013. "Does Cluster Policy Trigger R&D Activity? Evidence from German Biotech Contests," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(11), pages 1735-1759, November.
    2. Karl Aiginger & Rahel Falk & Andreas Reinstaller, 2009. "Evaluation of Government Funding in RTDI from a Systems Perspective in Austria. Synthesis Report," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 36402, February.
    3. Polt, Wolfgang & Berger, Martin & Boekholt, Patries & Cremers, Katrin & Egeln, Jürgen & Gassler, Helmut & Hofer, Reinhold & Rammer, Christian & Deuten, Jasper & Good, Barbara & Warta, Katharina, 2010. "Das deutsche Forschungs- und Innovationssystem: Ein internationaler Sytemvergleich zur Rolle von Wissenschaft, Interaktionen und Governance für die technologische Leistungsfähigkeit," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 11-2010, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    4. Eickelpasch, Alexander & Fritsch, Michael, 2005. "Contests for cooperation--A new approach in German innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1269-1282, October.
    5. Schwartz, Michael & Peglow, Francois & Fritsch, Michael & Günther, Jutta, 2010. "What Determines the Innovative Success of Subsidized Collaborative R&D Projects? – Project-Level Evidence from Germany –," IWH Discussion Papers 7/2010, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    6. Oliver Falck & Stefan Kipar, 2010. "The High-Tech Offensive of the Free State of Bavaria," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(03), pages 21-26, February.
    7. Scharpf, Fritz W., 2005. "Recht und Politik in der Reform des deutschen Föderalismus," MPIfG Working Paper 05/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Dirk Dohse, 2007. "Cluster-Based Technology Policy—The German Experience," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 69-94.
    9. Alexander Eickelpasch & Christoph Grenzmann, 2009. "Wo viel geforscht wird, wird nicht immer viel gefördert," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 76(29), pages 468-473.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janina Reinkowski, 2014. "Empirical Essays in the Economics of Ageing and the Economics of Innovation," ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 53.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Graf, Holger & Broekel, Tom, 2020. "A shot in the dark? Policy influence on cluster networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    2. Mitze, Timo & Strotebeck, Falk, 2019. "Determining factors of interregional research collaboration in Germany's biotech network: Capacity, proximity, policy?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 40-53.
    3. Dohse, Dirk & Staehler, Tanja, 2008. "BioRegio, BioProfile and the rise of the German biotech industry," Kiel Working Papers 1456, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Hiroyuki Okamuro & Junichi Nishimura, 2015. "Not just financial support? Another role of public subsidy in university-industry research collaborations," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(7), pages 633-659, October.
    5. Stefano Basilico & Uwe Cantner & Holger Graf, 2023. "Policy influence in the knowledge space: a regional application," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 591-622, April.
    6. Dirk Fornahl & Robert Hassink & Max-Peter Menzel, 2015. "Broadening Our Knowledge on Cluster Evolution," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 1921-1931, October.
    7. Blandinieres, Florence & Krieger, Bastian & Pellens, Maikel, 2021. "Cluster support activities in the German biotechnology sector," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 233052.
    8. Benner, Maximilian, 2012. "Clusterwettbewerbe: Eine Option für Entwicklungsländer? [Cluster competitions: An option for developing countries?]," MPRA Paper 40743, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Johannes Koenig & Thomas Brenner & Guido Buenstorf, 2017. "Regional effects of university funding: Excellence at the cost of regional disparity?," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 37(2), pages 111-133, October.
    10. Hiroyuki Okamuro & Junichi Nishimura, 2015. "Local Management of National Cluster Policies: Comparative Case Studies of Japanese, German, and French Biotechnology Clusters," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-27, November.
    11. Dirk Fornahl & Sebastian Henn & Max-Peter Menzel (ed.), 2010. "Emerging Clusters," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13533.
    12. Okamuro, Hiroyuki & Nishimura, Junichi, 2011. "Management of Cluster Policies: Case Studies of Japanese, German, and French Bio-clusters," CEI Working Paper Series 2011-7, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    13. Stefan Töpfer & Uwe Cantner & Holger Graf, 2019. "Structural dynamics of innovation networks in German Leading-Edge Clusters," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1816-1839, December.
    14. Erik E. Lehmann & Matthias Menter, 2018. "Public cluster policy and performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 558-592, June.
    15. Matthias Kiese, 2010. "Policy Transfer and Institutional Learning: An Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Cluster Policies in Germany," Chapters, in: Dirk Fornahl & Sebastian Henn & Max-Peter Menzel (ed.), Emerging Clusters, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Evgeniy Kutsenko & Ekaterina Islankina & Vasiliy Abashkin & Elena Popova, 2020. "Towards An ‘Ideal’ Cluster Support Program: Blending The Approaches," HSE Working papers WP BRP 106/STI/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    17. Wang Dongling & Kelvin C.K. Lam, 2018. "Whether the Innovation Policy Will Really Improve Enterprise’s Innovation Performance— Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Learning," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 96-107, September.
    18. Sanwar A. Sunny & Cheng Shu, 2019. "Investments, incentives, and innovation: geographical clustering dynamics as drivers of sustainable entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 905-927, April.
    19. Max-Peter Menzel, 2010. "Sources of ‘Second Generation Growth’: Spin-off Processes in the Emerging Biochip Industries in Jena and Berlin," Chapters, in: Dirk Fornahl & Sebastian Henn & Max-Peter Menzel (ed.), Emerging Clusters, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Mitze, Timo & Strotebeck, Falk, 2017. "Modeling interregional research collaborations in German biotechnology using industry directory data: A quantitative social network analysis," MPRA Paper 83392, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:efisdi:112011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-fi.de/index.php?id=1&L=1 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.