IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diceop/49.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Bestimmung von Nachfragemacht im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirischer Nachweis

Author

Listed:
  • Haucap, Justus
  • Heimeshoff, Ulrich
  • Klein, Gordon J.
  • Rickert, Dennis
  • Wey, Christian

Abstract

In der wettbewerbsbehördlichen Fallpraxis gewinnt die Bestimmung von Nachfragemacht zunehmend an Bedeutung. Bei Fusionsvorhaben im Einzelhandel kann Nachfragemacht ein Hauptgrund für eine Untersagung bzw. für Auflagen sein. In diesem Beitrag wird die aktuelle Diskussion zur Bestimmung von Nachfragemacht kritisch aufgearbeitet. Zu diesem Zweck stellen wir die deutsche Fallpraxis exemplarisch im Licht des aktuellen Stands der empirischen Forschung dar und leiten daraus Vorschläge zur Verbesserung und Präzisierung der Analyse von Nachfragemacht ab.

Suggested Citation

  • Haucap, Justus & Heimeshoff, Ulrich & Klein, Gordon J. & Rickert, Dennis & Wey, Christian, 2013. "Die Bestimmung von Nachfragemacht im Lebensmitteleinzelhandel: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirischer Nachweis," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 49, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diceop:49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/88549/1/774604743.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haucap, Justus & Fritz, Daniel & Thorwarth, Susanne, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Wettbewerbsverzerrungen am Messestandort Deutschland," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 111, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    2. Elges, Carsten, 2016. "Die Preissetzung in Unternehmenskooperationen: Erste spieltheoretische Überlegungen," Arbeitspapiere 162, University of Münster, Institute for Cooperatives.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diceop:49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diduede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.