In the independent-private-value model, we allow resale among bidders following a first-price sealed-bid, second-price sealed-bid, or English auction with two bidders. We consider two regimes with regard to the disclosure of the sealed bids: full disclosure and no disclosure. Either the auction winner or the auction loser chooses the resale mechanism. Thanks to three key properties our model shares with the common-value model, we obtain explicit formulas for the equilibria. We circumvent the “ratchet effect,” by “randomizing” every pure equilibrium under no disclosure into an equivalent behavioral equilibrium under full disclosure. We compare the auctioneer’s revenues across auctions and bargaining procedures. We present some nbidder extensions.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by York University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
2008_06.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Rod Garratt & Thomas Tröger, 2005.
"Speculation in Standard Auctions with Resale,"
Discussion Papers
42, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
[Downloadable!]
Gale, Ian L & Hausch, Donald B & Stegeman, Mark, 2000.
"Sequential Procurement with Subcontracting,"
International Economic Review,
Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 41(4), pages 989-1020, November.
Garratt, Rod & Troger, Thomas & Zheng, Charles Zhoucheng, 2007.
"Collusion via Resale,"
Staff General Research Papers
12829, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Rodney J. Garratt & Thomas Tröger & Charles Z. Zheng, 2009.
"Collusion via Resale,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1095-1136, 07.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Jeremy Bulow & Ming Huang & Paul Klemperer, 1999.
"Toeholds and Takeovers,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(3), pages 427-454, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Jeremy Bulow & Ming Huang & Paul Klemperer, 1999.
"Toeholds and Takeovers,"
Finance
9903005, EconWPA.
[Downloadable!]
Giacomo Calzolari & Alessandro Pavan, 2004.
"Monopoly with Resale,"
Discussion Papers
1393, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Giacomo Calzolari & Alessandro Pavan, 2005.
"Monopoly with Resale,"
Discussion Papers
1405, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Giacomo Calzolari & Alessandro Pavan, 2003.
"Monopoly with Resale,"
Working Papers
2003.20, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
[Downloadable!]
Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.