This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Incentives to Grow: Multimarket Firms and Predation

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Rainer Nitsche
Abstract

Network industries with low sunk costs have been popular examples for the theory of contestable markets and spatial competition models. We argue that, due to the multimarket nature of operations, theories of predation are more relevant to explain strategic behaviour. Building on well established reputation models our contribution is threefold. First, we use a more realistic sequencing of the game and strengthen the entry deterrence result. Second, we show that rational multimarket firms may use (the threat of) predatory entry to expand. Third, we allow strategic interaction of two multimarket firms and find that multimarket firms do not "attack'' each other.

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG - (Expansionsanreize: Multimarktunternehmen und Verdrängungsstrategien)
Netzwerkindustrien mit geringen versunkenen Kosten dienten häufig als Anwendungsfelder für die Theorie der bestreitbaren Märkte und für Modelle des räumlichen Wettbewerbs. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird argumentiert, daß aufgrund der Multimarktnatur dieser Branchen Theorien des Verdrängungsverhaltens eine relevantere Erklärung des strategischen Verhaltens liefern. Auf der Basis der etablierten Reputationsmodelle werden drei Neuerungen entwickelt. Erstens wird eine Spielsequenz eingeführt, die nicht nur realistischer ist als die herkömmliche Modellierung, sondern auch zu einer plausibleren Prognose führt: Verhinderung von Markteintritt in sämtlichen Märkten. Zweitens wird gezeigt, daß rationale Multimarktunternehmen die Drohung eines Markteintritts mit anschließender Verdrängung des alteingesessenen "Mittelständlers" (Einmarktunternehmens) im Rahmen einer Expansionsstrategie glaubhaft nutzen können. Schließlich wird, drittens, die strategische Interaktion von zwei Multimarktunternehmen untersucht. Es zeigt sich, daß sie auf gegenseitigen "Angriff" verzichten und nicht in einen Markt des jeweils anderen Multimarkt-Wettbewerbers eindringen.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://skylla.wz-berlin.de/pdf/2000/iv00-19.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG) in its series CIG Working Papers with number FS IV 00-19.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 48 pages
Date of creation: Dec 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wzb:wzebiv:fsiv00-19

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Reichpietschufer 50, 10785 Berlin, Germany
Phone: (++49)(30) 25491-441
Fax: (++49)(30) 25491-442
Web page: http://www.wzb.eu/mp/wiw/default.en.htm
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Jennifer Rontganger).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Fudenberg, Drew & Tirole, Jean, 1991. "Perfect Bayesian equilibrium and sequential equilibrium," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 236-260, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Hendel, Igal, 1996. "Competition under Financial Distress," Journal of Industrial Economics, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(3), pages 309-24, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Dodgson, J. S. & Newton, C. R. & Katsoulacos, Y., 1992. "A modelling framework for the empirical analysis of predatory behaviour in the bus services industry," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 51-70, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Shepherd, William G, 1984. ""Contestability" vs. Competition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(4), pages 572-87, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Steven C. Salop, 1979. "Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 141-156, Spring. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Schmidt, K.M., 1992. "Reputation and Equilibrium Characterization in Repeated Games with Conflicting Interests," Working papers 92-7, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
  7. Bolton, Patrick & Scharfstein, David S, 1990. "A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(1), pages 93-106, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Fudenberg, Drew & Levine, David K, 1989. "Reputation and Equilibrium Selection in Games with a Patient Player," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(4), pages 759-78, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  9. Kreps, David M. & Wilson, Robert, 1982. "Reputation and imperfect information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 253-279, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  10. Cripps, Martin W & Thomas, Jonathan P, 1995. "Reputation and Commitment in Two-Person Repeated Games without Discounting," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(6), pages 1401-19, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Milgrom, Paul & Roberts, John, 1982. "Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 280-312, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  12. Masso, Jordi, 1996. "A Note on Reputation: More on the Chain-Store Paradox," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 55-81, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Robert Evans & Jonathan P. Thomas, 1997. "Reputation and Experimentation in Repeated Games with Two Long-Run Players," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1153-1174, September.
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The RePEc project started in 1997. Its precursor, NetEc, dates back to 1993.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-19.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.