IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wsu/wpaper/rosenman-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Participation in Universal Prevention Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Rosenman
  • Scott Goates
  • Laura Hill

    (School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University)

Abstract

We analyze the decision to participate in community-based universal prevention programs through the framework of prospect theory, with family functionality, and related risk status, providing the reference point. We find that participation probability depends on the relative ratios of the weighting and valuation functions. Using data from the Strengthening Families Program and the Washington Healthy Youth Survey, we empirically test the implications of our model. We find that family functionality affects the participation decision in complex and, in some cases, non-linear ways. We discuss the implication of these findings for cost-effectiveness analysis, and suggest directions for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Rosenman & Scott Goates & Laura Hill, 2009. "Participation in Universal Prevention Programs," Working Papers 2009-09, School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsu:wpaper:rosenman-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://faculty.ses.wsu.edu/WorkingPapers/Rosenman/WP2009-09_UniversalPreventionProg.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2009
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imbens, Guido W, 1992. "An Efficient Method of Moments Estimator for Discrete Choice Models with Choice-Based Sampling," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(5), pages 1187-1214, September.
    2. Cosslett, Stephen R, 1981. "Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Choice-Based Samples," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(5), pages 1289-1316, September.
    3. Ana Isabel Gil & Jose Alberto Molina, 2007. "Human development and alcohol abuse in adolescence," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 1315-1323.
    4. Robert J. Brent, 1998. "Estimating the effectiveness and benefits of alcohol treatment programmes for use in economic evaluations," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 217-226, February.
    5. Hill, L.G. & Goates, S.G. & Rosenman, R., 2010. "Detecting selection effects in community implementations of family-based substance abuse prevention programs," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(4), pages 623-630.
    6. Ambrose Leung, 2004. "Delinquency, schooling, and work: time allocation decision of youth," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(9), pages 987-993.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erard, Brian, 2017. "Modeling Qualitative Outcomes by Supplementing Participant Data with General Population Data: A Calibrated Qualitative Response Estimation Approach," MPRA Paper 79927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Erard, Brian, 2017. "Modeling Qualitative Outcomes by Supplementing Participant Data with General Population Data: A New and More Versatile Approach," MPRA Paper 99887, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 26 Apr 2020.
    3. Nkegbe, Paul Kwame & Abdul Mumin, Yazeed, 2022. "Impact of community development initiatives and access to community markets on household food security and nutrition in Ghana," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esmeralda Ramalho, 2004. "Covariate Measurement Error in Endogenous Stratified Samples," Economics Working Papers 2_2004, University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal).
    2. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae Lee, 2020. "Causal Inference under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions," Papers 2004.08318, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    3. Esmerelda A. Ramalho & Richard Smith, 2003. "Discrete choice non-response," CeMMAP working papers 07/03, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    4. Imbens, Guido W. & Lancaster, Tony, 1996. "Efficient estimation and stratified sampling," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 289-318, October.
    5. Daniel McFadden, 2001. "Economic Choices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 351-378, June.
    6. Wayne E. Baker & Nathaniel Bulkley, 2014. "Paying It Forward vs. Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1493-1510, October.
    7. Prokhorov, Artem & Schmidt, Peter, 2009. "GMM redundancy results for general missing data problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 47-55, July.
    8. Ramalho Esmeralda A., 2010. "Covariate Measurement Error: Bias Reduction under Response-Based Sampling," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(4), pages 1-34, September.
    9. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae (Simon) Lee, 2020. "Causal inference in case-control studies," CeMMAP working papers CWP19/20, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Wonsang Ryu & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Thomas H. Brush, 2020. "The effects of multimarket contact on partner selection for technology cooperation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 267-289, February.
    11. Adam M. Kleinbaum & Toby E. Stuart & Michael L. Tushman, 2013. "Discretion Within Constraint: Homophily and Structure in a Formal Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1316-1336, October.
    12. Kyungchul Song, 2009. "Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects under Treatment-Based Sampling," PIER Working Paper Archive 09-011, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    13. Tripathi, Gautam, 2011. "Generalized method of moments (GMM) based inference with stratified samples when the aggregate shares are known," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 258-265.
    14. Gonzalez, Pedro & Vasconcellos, Geraldo M. & Kish, Richard J., 1998. "Cross-border mergers and acquisitions: The undervaluation hypothesis," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 25-45.
    15. Esmeralda A. Ramalho & Richard J. Smith, 2013. "Discrete Choice Non-Response," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 80(1), pages 343-364.
    16. Esmeralda A. Ramalho & Joaquim J. S. Ramalho, 2006. "Two‐Step Empirical Likelihood Estimation Under Stratified Sampling When Aggregate Information Is Available," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 74(5), pages 577-592, September.
    17. Nail Kashaev, 2022. "Estimation of Parametric Binary Outcome Models with Degenerate Pure Choice-Based Data with Application to COVID-19-Positive Tests from British Columbia," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 20225, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
    18. Shi Chang & Rohan Singh Wilkho & Nasir Gharaibeh & Garett Sansom & Michelle Meyer & Francisco Olivera & Lei Zou, 2023. "Environmental, climatic, and situational factors influencing the probability of fatality or injury occurrence in flash flooding: a rare event logistic regression predictive model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3957-3978, April.
    19. Tawei Wang & Karthik N. Kannan & Jackie Rees Ulmer, 2013. "The Association Between the Disclosure and the Realization of Information Security Risk Factors," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 201-218, June.
    20. Wang, C. Y. & Wang, Suojin & Carroll, R. J., 1997. "Estimation in choice-based sampling with measurement error and bootstrap analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 65-86, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Prospect Theory; Treatment Outcomes; Risk Status;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsu:wpaper:rosenman-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danielle Engelhardt (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecwsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.