Emilia Tomczyk () (Department of Applied Econometrics, Warsaw School of Economics)
Abstract
Paper compares two major schools of economic thought – neoclassical and evolutionary – from the perspective of keystone assumption: rationality of economic agents. It discusses role of rationality assumption in neoclassical and evolutionary theories; importance of expectations; and perspectives for analyzing them within the framework of evolutionary game theory – namely, through replicator dynamics.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Department of Applied Econometrics, Warsaw School of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
8.
Find related papers by JEL classification: B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Institutional; Evolutionary C79 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Other D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations