Mr. Fairmind Is Post-Welfarist: Opinions on Distributive Justice
AbstractI survey the results of empirical research, showing that the opinions about distributive justice of the population at large are in sharp conflict with the assumptions of traditional welfare economics. I focus on the results concerning welfarism and concerning the Pigou-Dalton transfer criterion. At the same time, I show that recent developments in social choice theory are much more in line with the empirical results. This suggests that a better understanding of the complementarity between empirical and theoretical work might lead to a richer debate and to a greater awareness of the possible biases in the economic approach.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën, Working Group Public Economics in its series Public Economics Working Paper Series with number ces9809.
Length: 34 pp.
Date of creation: 1998
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published (French version) in Revue Economique, 1999, 50, pp. 811-831.
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Naamsestraat 69, 3000 Leuven
Phone: +32-(0)16-32 67 25
Fax: +32-(0)16-32 67 96
Web page: http://www.econ.kuleuven.ac.be/ew/academic/econover/default.htm
More information through EDIRC
Other versions of this item:
- Erik Schokkaert, 1998. "Mr. Fairmind is Post-Welfarist: Opinions on Distributive Justice," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces9809, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Gilles le Garrec, 2009.
"Feeling guilty and redistributive politics,"
Documents de Travail de l'OFCE
2009-22, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
- Erik Schokkaert & Kurt Devooght, 1999.
"Responsibility-sensitive fair compensation in different cultures,"
LSE Research Online Documents on Economics
6574, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Erik Schokkaert & Kurt Devooght, 2003. "Responsibility-sensitive fair compensation in different cultures," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 207-242, October.
- Kurt Devooght & Erik Schokkaert, 1999. "Responsibility-Sensitive Fair Compensation in Different Cultures," STICERD - Distributional Analysis Research Programme Papers 46, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
- Corneo, Giacomo & Fong, Christina, 2005.
"What's the monetary value of distributive justice?,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
5227, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Giacomo Corneo & Christina M. Fong, 2006. "What’s the Monetary Value of Distributive Justice?," CESifo Working Paper Series 1706, CESifo Group Munich.
- Corneo, Giacomo & Fong, Christina M., 2007. "What´s the monetary value of distributive justice," Discussion Papers 2007/8, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
- Gilles Le Garrec, 2011.
"Redistribution and the cultural transmission of the taste for fairness,"
Documents de Travail de l'OFCE
2011-24, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
- Gilles Le Garrec, 2011. "Redistribution and the cultural transmission of the taste for fairness," Sciences Po publications 2011-24, Sciences Po.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kristof Bosmans).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.