This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Firm Ownership and Economic Efficiency

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
George C. Bitros (Athens University of Economics & Business)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

The objective in this paper is to improve the existing evidence regarding the role ownership plays in economic efficiency. It is pursued through enhancements in modeling, estimation techniques, and experimental design. With respect to modeling, state ownership is explicitly introduced into the simple model of the financially constrained firm in order to trace its implications. In turn, the interrelated, three-equation input demand model that emerges is estimated with consistent panel data techniques, using information gathered from state and private firms that operated in large-scale Greek manufacturing during the 1979-1988 period. The results show that, per unit of output, the amounts of labor, capital, and credits employed by state firms were 15.7, 12.2, and 49.1 percent larger than those employed by private firms in the same industries. Moreover, taking input prices into consideration, these findings indicated that state firms incurred 46.2 percent higher costs per unit of output and that liable for their relative inefficiency were technical, allocative and ownership reasons by contributing respectively 16.3, 25.5 and 4.4 percentage points. Last, but not least, state ownership was found to alter significantly the conventional patterns in which the employment of inputs responds to equity and input price changes. Thus, in contrast to claims made by some researchers, state ownership may influence economic efficiency as well as exercise several other important effects.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://129.3.20.41/eps/mic/papers/0303/0303002.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Microeconomics with number 0303002.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: 12 Mar 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpmi:0303002

Note: Type of Document - Acrobat.pdf; prepared on IBM PC - PC; to print on HP/PostScript; pages: 31 ; figures: included. Acrobat PDF document submitted via ftp.
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://129.3.20.41

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (EconWPA).

Related research
Keywords: ownership; firm governance; factor of production interrelations; economic efficiency.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Capital and Total Factor Productivity; Capacity
L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Boundaries of Public and Private Enterprise; Privatization; Contracting Out

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Andrei Shleifer, 1998. "State Versus Private Ownership," NBER Working Papers 6665, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. De Fraja, Giovanni, 1991. "Efficiency and Privatisation in Imperfectly Competitive Industries," Journal of Industrial Economics, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(3), pages 311-21, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Ohlsson, Henry, 1996. "Ownership and input prices: A comparison of public and private enterprises," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 33-38, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. Arellano, M., 1989. "A Note On The Anderson-Hsiao Estimator For Panel Data," Economics Series Working Papers 9975, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    Other versions:
  5. Nadiri, M Ishaq & Rosen, Sherwin, 1969. "Interrelated Factor Demand Functions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(4), pages 457-71, Part I Se. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Vining, Aidan R & Boardman, Anthony E, 1992. " Ownership versus Competition: Efficiency in Public Enterprise," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 205-39, March.
  7. Zhenhui Xu & Melissa Birch, 1999. "The Economic Performance of State-owned Enterprises in Argentina an Empirical Assessment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 355-375, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Rafael La Porta & Florencio López-De-Silanes, 1999. "The Benefits Of Privatization: Evidence From Mexico," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 114(4), pages 1193-1242, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  9. Holtz-Eakin, Douglas & Newey, Whitney & Rosen, Harvey S, 1988. "Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 56(6), pages 1371-95, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Hausman, Jerry A, 1978. "Specification Tests in Econometrics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(6), pages 1251-71, November. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Kathryn L. DeWenter & Paul H. Malatesta, 2001. "State-Owned and Privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(1), pages 320-334, March. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Ehrlich, Isaac & Georges Gallais-Hamonno & Zhiqiang Liu & Randall Lutter, 1994. "Productivity Growth and Firm Ownership: An Analytical and Empirical Investigation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(5), pages 1006-38, October. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  13. Bardhan, Pranab & Roemer, John E, 1992. "Market Socialism: A Case for Rejuvenation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 101-16, Summer. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  14. Katsoulacos Yannis, 1994. "Firms' Objectives in Transition Economies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 392-409, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  15. Douglas Holtz-Eakin & Whitney K. Newey & Harvey S. Rosen, 1989. "The Revenues-Expenditures Nexus: Evidence from Local Government Data," NBER Working Papers 2180, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  16. Anderson, T. W. & Hsiao, Cheng., 1980. "Estimation of Dynamic Models with Error Components," Working Papers 336, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. B.N.Goldar & V.S.Renganathan & Rashmi Banga, 2003. "Ownership and efficiency in engineering firms in India, 1990-91 to 1999-2000," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 115, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India. [Downloadable!]
  2. Bitros, George C. & Karayiannis, Anastassios D., 2008. "Entrepreneurial Morality: Some Indications from Greece," MPRA Paper 13837, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Dec 2008. [Downloadable!]
  3. Vidya Mahambare & V. N. Balasubramanyam, 2005. "Trade Liberalisation and India’s Manufacturing Sector," Development and Comp Systems 0505010, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc and its associated services are free for contributors and users, and do not accept any advertising.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.