This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Impacts Of Labour Market Liberalisation And Government Commitment To Reform: Zimbabwe, 1991-2000

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Blessing Chiripanhura (Economics Department. University of Sheffield, UK)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper analyses labour market liberalisation and government commitment to economic reforms in Zimbabwe. The paper briefly analyses the economic policies that were implemented between 1980 and 1990 that were characterised by massive interventions in the labour market. It problematises the economic problems faced then, and examines how these persuaded the government to implement economic reforms in 1991. Economic reforms in this paper are synonymous with structural adjustment programmes of the IMF and the World Bank. The reforms included liberalisation of the controls that inhibited employment in the economy. While pointing out that the reform period was 1991 to 1996, it argues that the period up to 1999 must be analysed as reform period because of the active involvement of the IMF in economic policy formulation. The paper analyses the extent to which labour market liberalisation affected employment and wages. It briefly explores the impact of the reforms on allocative and dynamic efficiencies and income distribution. It also analyses the performance of the economy over the period after the reforms to establish the importance of government commitment to the success and/or failure of reforms. It concludes that economic reforms in Zimbabwe had adverse impact on employment (both quality and quantity) and wages. Furthermore, government commitment to reform is critical both for the full implementation of the reforms and for the realisation of the expected benefits of the reforms.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://129.3.20.41/eps/lab/papers/0512/0512013.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Labor and Demography with number 0512013.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 59 pages
Date of creation: 22 Dec 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpla:0512013

Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 59
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://129.3.20.41

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (EconWPA).

Related research
Keywords: labour market reform; Zimbabwe; ESAP; structural adjustment; economic reforms; labour market flexibility;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
J - Labor and Demographic Economics

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Raymond Vreeland, James, 2002. "The Effect of IMF Programs on Labor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 121-139, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also covers the most complete directory of Economics departments and institutes, EDIRC.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.