IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpit/0309012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The WTO Trade Policy Review of India, 1998

Author

Listed:
  • Arvind Panagariya

    (University of Maryland)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Arvind Panagariya, 2003. "The WTO Trade Policy Review of India, 1998," International Trade 0309012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0309012
    Note: Type of Document - Tex/WordPerfect/Handwritten; prepared on IBM PC - PC-TEX/UNIX Sparc TeX; to print on HP/PostScript/Franciscan monk; figures: included/request from author/draw your own
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/it/papers/0309/0309012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajesh Chadha & Sanjib Pohit & Alan V. Deardorff & Robert M. Stern, 1998. "Analysis of India’s Policy Reforms," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 235-259, March.
    2. Arvind Panagariya, 1999. "Trade Policy in South Asia: Recent Liberalisation and Future Agenda," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 353-378, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sagnik Bagchi & Surajit Bhattacharyya, 2019. "Country-Specific Determinants of Intra-Industry Trade in India," Foreign Trade Review, , vol. 54(3), pages 129-158, August.
    2. T.N. Srinivasan, 2001. "India's Reform of External Sector Policies and Future Multilateral Trade Negotiations," Working Papers 830, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    3. Beyza Ural Marchand & Ray Rees & Raymond Riezman, 2013. "The effect of parental labor supply on child schooling: evidence from trade liberalization in India," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 151-173, June.
    4. Anwarjl Hoda & Rajeev Ahuja, 2003. "Agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures: need for clarification and improvement," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 101, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    5. Monteagudo, Josefina & Rojas, Laura & Stabilito, Augusto & Watanuki, Masakazu, 2004. "The New Challenges of the Regional Trade Agenda for the Andean Countries," Conference papers 331234, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Wignaraja, Ganeshan & Nixson, Frederick, 2004. "Non-Tariff Measures, Technological Capability Building and Exports in India's Pharmaceutical Firms," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2004-06, United Nations University - INTECH.
    7. Athukorala, Prema-chandra, 2000. "Agricultural trade policy reform in South Asia: the role of the Uruguay round and policy options for the future WTO agenda," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 169-193.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monteagudo, Josefina & Rojas, Laura & Stabilito, Augusto & Watanuki, Masakazu, 2004. "The New Challenges of the Regional Trade Agenda for the Andean Countries," Conference papers 331234, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. James E. Rauch & Vitor Trindade, 2003. "Information, International Substitutability, and Globalization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 775-791, June.
    3. Drusilla K. Brown & Alan V. Deardorff & Robert M. Stern, 2000. "Computational Analysis of the Government of India's Market Opening Initiatives," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0002, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    4. Chadha, R. & Brown, D.K. & Deardorff, A.V. & Stern, R.M., 2000. "Computational Analysis of the Impact on India of the Uruguay Round and the Forthcoming WTO Trade Negotiations," Working Papers 459, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan.
    5. Jayatilleke S. Bandara & Christine Smith, 2002. "Trade Policy Reforms in South Asia and Australia-South Asia Trade: Intensities and Complementarities," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 3(2), pages 177-199, September.
    6. Jayatilleke S. Bandara & Wusheng Yu, 2003. "How Desirable is the South Asian Free Trade Area? A Quantitative Economic Assessment," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(9), pages 1293-1323, September.
    7. Shin, Inyong & Kim, Hyunho, 2010. "The effect of subsidy policies on the product quality improvement," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 687-696, May.
    8. Pohit, Sanjib & Chadha, Rajesh & Pratap, Devender & Ghosh, B. K., 1999. "Validating Prediction of a CGE Model of India: An Introspection," MPRA Paper 94860, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Sasidaran Gopalan & Ammar A. Malik & Kenneth A. Reinert, 2013. "The Imperfect Substitutes Model in South Asia," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 14(2), pages 211-230, September.
    10. Brent Davis, 2000. "India and the East Asia Miracle," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 63-76.
    11. C. Veeramani, 2019. "Fragmentation Trade and Vertical Specialisation: How Does South Asia Compare with China," Journal of Asian Economic Integration, , vol. 1(1), pages 97-128, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F2 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0309012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.