This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Trade Liberalization and Industrial Pollution in Mexico: Lessons for the FTAA"

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Kevin Gallagher (The Global Development And Environment Institute at Tufts Universty)
Abstract

As the barriers to hemispheric trade and integration are lowered, it will be asked whether we will we hear the "giant sucking sound" of poorer nations luring U.S. and Canadian firms south to take advantage of low wages and lax environmental regulations? Or, will Latin American nations passively accept this problematical specialization in doing the world's cheap and dirty work? Mexico is the ideal laboratory for such research. Though NAFTA took effect in 1994, trade liberalization in Mexico began long before that. From 1982 to 1996 Mexico transformed itself from one of the most closed to one of the most open economies in the world. As a first step in such efforts, this paper looks at the relationship between industrial pollution and economic activity in Mexico, compares those results to the United States, and draws out implications for the FTAA. The study finds that many of the industries deemed the dirtiest in the world economy are actually cleaner in Mexico than in the US, and the industries labeled the cleanest are dirtier in Mexico. To generalize, this exhibits that trade liberalization can have both positive and negative environmental effects in developing economies. Sectors where plant vintage determines pollution levels can benefit from their ability to take advantage of newer technologies after liberalizing trade, as is the case with the Mexican steel industry. However, if pollution is a function of end of pipe technology, as in the paper industry, pollution levels are determined by levels of regulation, enforcement and compliance, which are lower in Mexico.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://129.3.20.41/eps/it/papers/0106/0106003.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by EconWPA in its series International Trade with number 0106003.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: 13 Jun 2001
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpit:0106003

Note: Type of Document - PDF; pages: 24; figures: n/a. Other working papers available at www.gdae.org
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://129.3.20.41

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (EconWPA).

Related research
Keywords: Economic theory; Environmental Policy; Sustainability; trade liberalization; NAFTA; FTAA; industrial pollution;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
Q0 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General
O0 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - General

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All full texts are decentralized with the publishers, none reside on this server, thus making it possible to offer this service for free to all parties.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-9.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.