In developing countries undergoing liberalising economic reforms, there are typically local incumbents facing the loss of protection. Strategic lobbying by such firms for a price-capping regulatory regime is, under certain conditions, one way in which they can deter entry by competitors who are likely to be foreign firms. We show that a regulatory price can be set such that the net profit of the entrant is lower than the entry cost thus deterring entry. We then show that it is possible for the profit of the incumbent to be greater under regulation which deters entry than under unregulated duopoly. Counter-intuitively, we further discover that lobbying for regulation is to be expected where the incumbent firm is relatively cost-efficient. Finally, we consider the case of multiple incumbents threatened by entry. We observe a co- ordination problem and consider the possibility of co-operation in lobbying. We then show that such co-operation, if possible, is always preferable to non-co-operation.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: