We study a model in which two perfectly informed experts offer advice to a decision maker whose actions affect the welfare of all. Experts are biased and thus may wish to pull the decision maker in different directions and to different degrees. When the decision maker consults only a single expert, the expert withholds substantial information from the decision maker. We ask whether this situation is improved by having the decision maker consult a cabinet of (two) experts. We first show that there is no perfect Bayesian equilibrium in which full revelation occurs. When both experts are biased in the same direction, it is never beneficial to consult both. In contrast, when experts are biased in opposite directions, it is always beneficial to consult both. Finally, a cabinet of extremists is of no value.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Length: 33 pages Date of creation: 11 Feb 1999 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpga:9902003
Note: Type of Document - Latex using Scientific Workplace 3.0; prepared on IBM PC; to print on HP; pages: 33; figures: Three figures drawn in Latex are included in the document. Contact details of provider: Web page: http://129.3.20.41
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (EconWPA).
Vijay Krishna & John Morgan, 1999.
"A Model of Expertise,"
Working Papers
154, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Discussion Papers in Economics..
[Downloadable!]
Krishna, V. & Morgan, J., 1999.
"A Model of Expertise,"
Papers
206, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
Find related papers by JEL classification: C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Farrell, Joseph & Rabin, Matthew, 1996.
"Cheap Talk,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 103-18, Summer.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Morgan, J. & Stocken, P., 1998.
"An Analysis of Stock Recommendations,"
Papers
204, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
Other versions:
Steven A. Matthews & M. Okuno-Fujiwara & Andrew Postlewaite, 1990.
"Refining Cheap-Talk Equilibria,"
Discussion Papers
892R, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Ezra Friedman, 1998.
"Public Debate Among Experts,"
Discussion Papers
1234, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.) This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.