This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Verification, Validation and Evaluation of Expert Systems in Order to Develop a Safe Support in the Process of Decision Making

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Adrian Cojocariu (Tibiscus University Timisoara, Romania)
Alin Munteanu (Tibiscus University Timisoara, Romania)
Ofelia Sofran (Tibiscus University Timisoara, Romania)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Expert systems use computational techniques that involve making decisions, just as human experts do, but it is well known that human experts may be wrong from time to time. We used to think that designing and using an expert system will solve this problem, but unfortunately expert systems can also be wrong, although the system contains no errors, but the knowledge on which the system is based, even if it is the best available, does not offer an answer, or the right answer for any situation. A wrong answer might cause a lot of harm if the system in question is one for medical use, or a management decision support. If the person using the system has no experience or solid knowledge about the area the system has been designed for, he or she will not be able to judge the accuracy of the given advice. Considering that real-world knowledge bases may contain a large number of rules, there will be a very large number of computational paths through an expert system, and each one of them will have to pass a test of correctness. More than ever, the risk management will be an important part of the entire process of the system’s project planning and management. For these reasons it is important for the software engineering expert to make sure the validation, verification and evaluation of the system are made at their best.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://129.3.20.41/eps/comp/papers/0510/0510002.doc
File Format: application/msword
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by EconWPA in its series Computational Economics with number 0510002.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 4 pages
Date of creation: 23 Oct 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpco:0510002

Note: Type of Document - doc; pages: 4
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://129.3.20.41

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (EconWPA).

Related research
Keywords: expert system; knowledge base; errors; risk;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C8 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc also has a blog.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-17.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.