This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Non-Tariff Barriers and Trade Liberalization Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics A. Anderson
N. Schmitt
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
No abstract is available for
this item.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Paper provided by University of Sydney, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
9705.
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Apr 1997Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wop:syecwp:9705Contact details of provider: Postal: Department of Economics The University of Sydney N.S.W. 2006, Australia Phone: 61 +2 9351 5055 Fax: 61 +2 9351 4341 Email: Web page: http://www.usyd.edu.au/su/econ/welcome.htm More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
Keywords: Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: Moore, Michael O, 1992.
"Rules or Politics? An Empirical Analysis of ITC Anti-dumping Decisions ,"
Economic Inquiry ,
Oxford University Press, vol. 30(3), pages 449-66, July.
James A. Brander & Paul Krugman, 1983.
"A 'Reciprocal Dumping' Model of International Trade ,"
NBER Working Papers
1194, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
James Brander & Paul Krugman, 1980.
"A "Reciprocal Dumping" Model of International Trade ,"
Working Papers
405, Queen's University, Department of Economics.
James Brander & Paul Krugman, 1982.
"A 'Reciprocal Dumping' Model of International Trade ,"
Working Papers
513, Queen's University, Department of Economics.
Brander, James & Krugman, Paul, 1983.
"A 'reciprocal dumping' model of international trade ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 15(3-4), pages 313-321, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Robert Baldwin & Jeffrey Steagall, 1994.
"An analysis of ITC decisions in antidumping, countervailing duty and safeguard cases ,"
Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv) ,
Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 290-308, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Marvel, Howard P & Ray, Edward J, 1983.
"The Kennedy Round: Evidence on the Regulation of International Trade in the United States ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 73(1), pages 190-97, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Cassing, James H. & Hillman, Arye L., 1985.
"Political influence motives and the choice between tariffs and quotas ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 279-290, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Anderson, James E., 1993.
"Domino dumping II: Anti-dumping ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 35(1-2), pages 133-150, August.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: James Nieberding, 1999.
"The Effect of U.S. Antidumping Law on Firms' Market Power: An Empirical Test ,"
Review of Industrial Organization ,
Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 65-84, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 1995.
"Protection and the Business Cycle ,"
Discussion Papers
1130, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 1995.
"Protection and the Business Cycle ,"
NBER Working Papers
5168, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Kyle Bagwell & Robert Staiger, 2003.
"Protection and the Business Cycle ,"
Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy ,
Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 3(1), pages 1139-1139.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 2003.
"Protection and the Business Cycle ,"
The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy ,
Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 0(1).
[Downloadable!] Baldwin, Robert E., 1984.
"Trade policies in developed countries ,"
Handbook of International Economics ,
in: R. W. Jones & P. B. Kenen (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 12, pages 571-619
Elsevier.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Fischer, Ronald D., 1992.
"Endogenous probability of protection and firm behavior ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 32(1-2), pages 149-163, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Gallaway, Michael P. & Blonigen, Bruce A. & Flynn, Joseph E., 1999.
"Welfare costs of the U.S. antidumping and countervailing duty laws ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 211-244, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Krishna, Kala, 1989.
"Trade restrictions as facilitating practices ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 26(3-4), pages 251-270, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Kaempfer, William H & Marks, Stephen V & Willett, Thomas D, 1988.
"Why Do Large Countries Prefer Quantitative Trade Restrictions? ,"
Kyklos ,
Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 625-46.
Deardorff, Alan V., 1987.
"Why do governments prefer nontariff barriers? ,"
Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy ,
Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 191-216, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Rosendorff, B Peter, 1996.
"Voluntary Export Restraints, Antidumping Procedure, and Domestic Politics ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 544-61, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: repec:att:wimass:199511 is not listed on IDEAS
Anderson, Simon P. & Schmitt, Nicolas & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1995.
"Who benefits from antidumping legislation? ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 321-337, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Schmitt, Nicolas & Thisse, Jacques-François, 1992.
"Who Benefits from Antidumping Legislation? ,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
731, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Anderson, S. & Schmitt, N. & Thisse, J.F., 1992.
"Who Benifits from Antidumping Legislation? ,"
Discussion Papers
dp92-12, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
Brian R. Copeland, 1990.
"Strategic Interaction among Nations: Negotiable and Non-negotiable Trade Barriers ,"
Canadian Journal of Economics ,
Canadian Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 84-108, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Ray, Edward John, 1981.
"The Determinants of Tariff and Nontariff Trade Restrictions in the United States ,"
Journal of Political Economy ,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(1), pages 105-21, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Bagwell, Kyle & Staiger, Robert W, 1990.
"A Theory of Managed Trade ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 80(4), pages 779-95, September.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 1988.
"A Theory of Managed Trade ,"
NBER Working Papers
2756, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 1989.
"A Theory of Managed Trade ,"
Discussion Papers
801, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!] Bagwell, K. & Staiger, R.W., 1988.
"A Theory Of Managed Trade ,"
Papers
e-88-39, Stanford - Hoover Institution.
Falvey, Rodney E & Lloyd, P J, 1991.
"Uncertainty and the Choice of Protective Instrument ,"
Oxford Economic Papers ,
Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 463-78, July.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Brander, James A., 1981.
"Intra-industry trade in identical commodities ,"
Journal of International Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Anderson, James E, 1992.
"Domino Dumping, I: Competitive Exporters ,"
American Economic Review ,
American Economic Association, vol. 82(1), pages 65-83, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
McCulloch, Rachel, 1987.
"Why do governments prefer nontariff barriers? A comment on deardorff ,"
Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy ,
Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 217-221, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
George J. Stigler, 1971.
"The Theory of Economic Regulation ,"
Bell Journal of Economics ,
The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(1), pages 3-21, Spring.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Becker, Gary S, 1983.
"A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence ,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics ,
MIT Press, vol. 98(3), pages 371-400, August.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full
references Cited by : (explanations , Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Robert M. Feinberg & Kara M. Olson, 2005.
"Tariff Liberalization and Increased Administrative Protection: Is There a Quid Pro Quo? ,"
International Trade
0501001, EconWPA.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Michael Moore & Maurizio Zanardi, 2008.
"Trade Liberalization and Antidumping: Is There a Substitution Effect? ,"
ECARES Working Papers
2008_024, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Ecares.
[Downloadable!]
Access and
download statistics Did you know? About 1000 archives contribute their bibliographic data to RePEc .
This page was last updated on 2009-11-6.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .