We develop a theory for a transition economy under which an unbalanced development strategy that favors special economic zones emerges as a response to two critical problems: (1) political pressure to satisfy certain social expenditure requirements, and (2) the lack of institutions to constrain the state from expropriation. By promoting the concentration of resources in some areas, a low equilibrium trap can be avoided, while important spillover effects may be generated elsewhere. The experience of China with special economic zones and coastal open areas is interpreted in this light. Some problems in the Russian economy are also discussed in the context of this theory.
Key Words: Unbalanced Development, Special Economic Zones, Political Constraint, Commitment, Transition Economies
Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: O20, P41, H30
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Stanford University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
97044.
Find related papers by JEL classification: O20 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General P41 - Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: