IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/safiwp/96-07-044.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the Reliability of RNA folding Using Statistical Mechanics

Author

Listed:
  • Martijn Huynen
  • Robin Gutell
  • Danielle Konings

Abstract

We have analyzed the base-pair probability distribution of 16S and 16S-like and 23S and 23S-like ribosomal RNAs of Archaea, Bacteria, chloroplasts, mitochondria and Eukarya, as predicted by the partition function approach for RNA folding (McCaskill, 1990). A quantitative analysis of the reliability of RNA folding is done by comparing the base-pairing probability distributions with the structures predicted by comparative sequence analysis (comparative structure). We distinguish two factors that show a relationship to the reliability of RNA minimum free energy structure. The first factor is the dominance of one particular base-pair or the absence of base-pairing for a given base within the base-pairing probability distribution (BPPD): We characterize the BPPD per base, including the probability of not base-pairing, by its Shannon entropy (S). The S value indicates the uncertainty about the base-pairing of a base: low S values result from BPPDs that are strongly dominated by a single base-pair or by the absence of base-pairing. We show that bases with low S values have a relatively high probability that their Minimum Free Energy structure (MFE) corresponds to the comparative structure. The BPPDs of prokaryotes that live at high temperatures (thermophilic Archaea and Bacteria) have, calculated at 37 degrees C, lower S values, than the BPPDs or prokaryotes that live at lower temperatures (mesophilic and psychrophilic Archaea and Bacteria). This reflects an adaptation of the ribosomal RNAs to the environmental temperature. A second factor that is important to consider with regard to the reliability of MFE folding is a variable degree of applicability of the thermodynamic model of RNA folding for different groups of RNAs. Here we show that among the bases that show low S values, the Archaea and Bacteria have similar, high probabilities (.96 and .94 in 16S and .93 and .91 in 23S, respectively) that the MFE corresponds to the comparative structure. These probabilities are lower in the chloroplasts (16S .91, 23S .79), mitochondria (16S-like .89, 23S-like .69) and Eukarya (18S .81, 28S .86). Key words. RNA secondary structure, RNA folding, Boltzmann distribution, base-pairing probability distribution, ribosomal RNA

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn Huynen & Robin Gutell & Danielle Konings, 1996. "Assessing the Reliability of RNA folding Using Statistical Mechanics," Working Papers 96-07-044, Santa Fe Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:safiwp:96-07-044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:safiwp:96-07-044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epstfus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.