Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

On the Evolution of Polygamy: A Theoretical Examination of the Polygamy Threshold Model

Contents:

Author Info

  • Susan Ptak
  • Michael Lachmann
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The polygamy threshold model states that if costs incurred are less than the benefits gained from a polygamous relationship in terms of male or habitat quality, then polygamy is favored and could evolve. Here we construct mathematical models and computer simulations to evaluate this hypothesis theoretically. In the basic model, there is a single locus with two alleles, where this locus regulates whether or not the female is receptive to polygamy. There are two habitats of different quality for which females vie, and on which males randomly assort themselves. This basic model is extended mathematically to include cost to the initial female of a polygamously mated male and again to include gene expression in males. The computer simulations extend the basic model to multiple loci and alleles, and to multiple habitats. The results presented here suggest that the polygamy threshold model is valid in a population genetic context -- in all cases in which the fitness of females that actually mated polygamously is greater than the fitness of monogamous females on poorer habitats, polygamy evolved. However, using this approach revealed interesting dynamics not apparent from the original verbal model. If the trait is expressed in males and females, then polygamy can evolve even if females mating polygamously have a lower fitness than females mating monogamously. In the multiple habitat model, the polygamy allele increases to some equilibrium value above which it experiences no selection. Surprisingly, as the cost to polygamy increases, the equilibrium value of the polygamy allele also increases.

    Download Info

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Santa Fe Institute in its series Working Papers with number 01-01-001.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: Jan 2001
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:wop:safiwp:01-01-001

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501
    Web page: http://www.santafe.edu/sfi/publications/working-papers.html
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:safiwp:01-01-001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.