IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/jopovw/261.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Welfare Reform, Fertility and Father Involvement

Author

Listed:
  • Sara McLanahan
  • Marcia J. Carlson

Abstract

Recognizing that most poor families are single-parent families, the federal welfare reform law of 1996 emphasized the responsibility of both parents to support their children. In addition to strengthening the child support enforcement system, the law included several provisions to decrease nonmarital childbearing and to promote two-parent families. This article focuses on the important role fathers play in children?s lives and how public policies have affected childbearing and father involvement. Key observations are: 1. Children in father-absent families often have fewer economic and socio-emotional resources from their parents, and do not fare as well on many outcome measures, as children living with both biological parents. 2. Efforts to reduce the rising number of father-absent families by focusing on preventing unwanted pregnancy among unmarried women, especially teen girls, have met with some success, particularly those programs seeking to alter adolescents? life opportunities in addition to providing education or family planning services. 3. Efforts to encourage greater father involvement by focusing almost exclusively on increasing absent parents? child support payments reap only minimal benefits for poor children, because their absent parents often have few resources and little incentive to make support payments. 4. To date, efforts to increase the emotional involvement of unmarried fathers with their children have produced disappointing results, but new research suggests that such programs can make a difference when they target fathers and begin at the time of a new child?s birth. Many children will spend some time living away from their fathers, deprived of the financial and emotional resources fathers can provide. Because of the importance of fathers to child well-being, the authors conclude that new directions in research and public policies are needed to encourage greater father involvement across the wide diversity of family arrangements that exist in society today.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara McLanahan & Marcia J. Carlson, 2002. "Welfare Reform, Fertility and Father Involvement," JCPR Working Papers 261, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:jopovw:261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gorman, Bridget K. & Braverman, Jennifer, 2008. "Family structure differences in health care utilization among U.S. children," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(11), pages 1766-1775, December.
    2. W. Bradford Wilcox, 2002. "FOCUSED ON THEIR FAMILIES: Religion, Parenting, & Child Well-being," Working Papers 961, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    3. repec:pri:crcwel:wp02-12-wilcox is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:jopovw:261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/jcuchus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.