This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Verification Times Underlying the Kyoto Protocol: Global Benchmark Calculations

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
M. Jonas
S. Nilsson
M. Obersteiner
M. Gluck
Y.M. Ermoliev
Abstract

IIASA's Sustainable Boreal Forest Resources (FOR) Project is in the process of deriving full carbon accounts for a number of countries (Russia, Austria, Ukraine, etc.). These carbon accounts permit the Project to make generalized findings and to identify knowledge gaps relevant to the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol. In this study we focus on two questions that are central in this process:

1. What are the verification times arising from the different methods of carbon accounting, and can they be expected to be compatible with the commitment periods foreseen by the Kyoto Protocol?

2. How do verification times change as a result of changes in our knowledge of the underlying uncertainties?

To address these questions, we describe the concepts of favorable and unfavorable verification and calculate the verification times for four global-scale examples. We consider full carbon accounting (FCA) and partial carbon accounting (PCA) under both business-as-usual conditions and in combination with a global afforestation program. Although global in scale, the results of our calculations allow us to draw sub-global conclusions. These conclusions refer to:

-which of the two carbon accounting approaches (PCA or FCA), either in combination with Kyoto compliant land-use, land-use change, and forestry (LUCF) activities or not, represents the most practical method for implementing the Kyoto Protocol;

and, if the Kyoto Protocol is based on PCA under partial inclusion of biological sources and sinks resulting from direct human induced land-use change and forestry activities , to

-whether countries can gain an advantage over other countries by positioning themselves under unfavorable verification conditions by implementing Kyoto compliant LUCF projects; and

-whether the implementation of Kyoto compliant LUCF projects increases the difficulty of validating sub-global Kyoto compliant carbon reporting, thereby increasing the difficulty in conducting FCA-based carbon research at large spatial scales.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Documents/IR-99-062.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Documents/IR-99-062.ps
File Format: application/postscript
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in its series Working Papers with number ir99062.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Dec 1999
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wop:iasawp:ir99062

Contact details of provider:
Postal: A-2361 Laxenburg
Phone: +43-2236-807-0
Fax: +43-2236-71313
Email:
Web page: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Catalog/PUB_ONLINE.html
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Thomas Krichel).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. M. Jonas & B. Mayr & S. Schidler & M. Sotoudeh & H.M. Knoflacher, 1998. "Land-use Change and Forestry in Austria: A Scientific Assessment of Austria's Carbon Balance in Light of Article 3 of the Kyoto Protocol," Working Papers ir98028, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. [Downloadable!]
  2. M. Jonas & S. Nilsson & A. Shvidenko & V. Stolbovoi & M. Gluck & M. Obersteiner & A. Oeskog, 1999. "Full Carbon Accounting and the Kyoto Protocol: A Systems- Analytical View," Working Papers ir99025, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Odd Godal & Yuri Ermoliev & Ger Klaassen & Michael Obersteiner, 2003. "Carbon Trading with Imperfectly Observable Emissions," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(2), pages 151-169, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Z. Harkin & G. Bull, 2000. "Towards Developing a Comprehensive Carbon Accounting Framework for Forests in British Columbia," Working Papers ir00046, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Each page is provided with a technical contact, in case something is not right with the supplied information. See under "publisher info".

This page was last updated on 2009-12-2.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.