Restricting Weights in Value Efficiency Analysis
AbstractIn this paper, we consider the problem of incorporating additional preference information into Value Efficiency Analysis by using the "price" information of inputs and outputs. This is done to improve the accuracy of the estimation of the Value Efficiency Scores. Value Efficiency developed by Halme et al (1998) is an efficiency concept, which takes into account the decision maker's preferences. Value Efficiency Analysis is based on the assumption that an explicitly known value function reaches its maximum at the Most Preferred Solution on the efficient frontier. The Most Preferred solution is an input- output vector preferred to all other possible input-output vectors. The ultimate goal is to measure a need to improve (radially) the values of inputs and/or outputs to make them equally preferred to the Most Preferred Solution. Because we do not know the value function, we approximate the indifference curves of all possible value functions satisfying certain assumptions by their tangents at the Most Preferred Solution. However, in addition to the Most preferred Solution information about the "prices" of inputs and outputs may be available as well. We show how this information can be incorporated into the analysis and illustrate the approach by an example on the performance of municipal dental units in Finland.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in its series Working Papers with number ir98104.
Date of creation: Dec 1998
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: A-2361 Laxenburg
Web page: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Publications/Catalog/PUB_ONLINE.html
More information through EDIRC
Other versions of this item:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Tarja Joro & Pekka Korhonen & Jyrki Wallenius, 1998. "Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(7), pages 962-970, July.
- Thompson, Russell G. & Langemeier, Larry N. & Lee, Chih-Tah & Lee, Euntaik & Thrall, Robert M., 1990. "The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1-2), pages 93-108.
- Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
- Thanassoulis, E. & Dyson, R. G., 1992. "Estimating preferred target input-output levels using data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 80-97, January.
- P. Korhonen, 1998. "Multiple Objective Programming Support," Working Papers ir98010, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
- M. Halme & T. Joro & P. Korhonen & S. Salo & J. Wallenius, 1998. "Value Efficiency Analysis for Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis," Working Papers ir98054, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
- R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
- Frantisek Brazdik, 2005. "Oriented stochastic data envelopment models: Ranking comparison to stochastic frontier approach," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp271, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economic Institute, Prague.
- Hinojosa, M.A. & Mármol, A.M., 2011. "Axial solutions for multiple objective linear problems. An application to target setting in DEA models with preferences," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 159-167, April.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Krichel).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.