IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/briedp/101.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fiscal Deficit Reduction: An Evaluation of Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • W. J. McKibbin
  • P. Bagnoli

Abstract

In this paper we consider a number of alternative policies aimed at reducing the U.S. fiscal deficit over the course of the 1990s. We offer a quantitative evaluation of these policies that incorporates a number of usually overlooked aspects. One is the role of forward looking asset markets in the adjustment to a credible deficit reduction package. The second is the international impacts ofthe policy and how these spill overs effect the outcome in the United States through changes in exchange rates, trade and capital flows. Third, we explicitly deal with the supply side implications of the alternative proposals as well as the conventional effects on aggregate demand. As a starting point, we consider the Clinton program as announced in February 1993. We find that this program is a credible deficit reduction strategy which should have a short run stimulative effect on the economy in 1993 but during 1994and 1995 the program will tend to slow economic growth unless accompanied by some accommodating monetary policy by the Federal Reserve. Sustained benefits to the U.S. economy emerge by 1998.

Suggested Citation

  • W. J. McKibbin & P. Bagnoli, "undated". "Fiscal Deficit Reduction: An Evaluation of Alternatives," Discussion Papers 101, Brookings Institution International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:briedp:101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://apps89.brookings.edu/views/papers/bdp/BDP101/Bdp101.pdf
    File Function: text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tatsuji Hayakawa & Paul Zak, 2002. "Debt, Death and Taxes," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 9(2), pages 157-173, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:briedp:101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/brookus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.