IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa13p668.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sugar Cane Burning and Human Health: An Analysis Using Spatial Propensity Score Matching

Author

Listed:
  • Andre Chagas
  • Alex Almeida
  • Carlos Azzoni

Abstract

The production of ethanol and sugar from sugar cane has sharply increased for the last 20 years. If there are overall incentives to substitute the consumption of fossil fuels by biofuels, the increase of production and the expansion of new cultivated areas of sugar cane have eventually an impact on human health and employment mainly at regional levels. To harvest the crop--mostly manually done by low-skill workers--the practice of burning to clean dry grasses and poisonous insects has been executed for years during the dry season, what increase the productivity of workers. However, the burning generates a massive quantity of smoke that spread in the region reaching cities and becoming a potential threat to the human health. For example, many studies have linked the straw burning of sugarcane with respiratory diseases in the producing regions. Due to this, in the state of Sao Paulo, the largest sugarcane´s producer in Brazil - the state is responsible for 60% of total production, but only 25% the mechanized harvest are mechanized -- a law was approved, in 2002, to enforce sugar cane mills to completely stop the burning of sugar cane before the harvest until 2030. The main objective of this paper is to investigate the impact of the burning prohibition of sugar cane on respiratory problems of children, teenagers and elderly people. This analysis focuses also on other socio-economic determinants such as GDP, demographic density, job opportunities, and Human Development Index of municipalities for which sugar cane activity plays an important role economically. With a recent methodology developed based on spatial propensity score matching we compare municipalities where burning is still going on with those where are not. We try to capture the socio-economic interactions among the agents in their interrelated economic system through spatial analysis. The data used in this study corresponds to a balanced panel of 645 municipalities from 2002 to 2007 where the geographic coordinates of burning occur, morbidity and other economic indicators are available.

Suggested Citation

  • Andre Chagas & Alex Almeida & Carlos Azzoni, 2013. "Sugar Cane Burning and Human Health: An Analysis Using Spatial Propensity Score Matching," ERSA conference papers ersa13p668, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa13/ERSA2013_paper_00668.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marcos A. Rangel & Tom Vogl, 2016. "Agricultural Fires and Infant Health," NBER Working Papers 22955, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Marcos A. Rangel & Tom S. Vogl, 2016. "Agricultural Fires and Infant Health," Working Papers rangel_vogl_fires.pdf, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies..
    3. Marcos A. Rangel & Tom S. Vogl, 2019. "Agricultural Fires and Health at Birth," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 101(4), pages 616-630, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sugar Cane Burning; Health Condition; Spatial Econometrics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.