Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Industry-specific firm growth and agglomeration

Contents:

Author Info

  • Matthias Duschl
  • Tobias Scholl

    ()

  • Thomas Brenner
  • Dennis Luxen
  • Falk Raschke

Abstract

This paper studies the industry-specific relationship between industrial clustering and firm growth. The literature usually considers industrial clusters as positive for the general economic development of regions. In particular, their relationship with the formation rate of new firms and the survival rate of existing firms is well documented. However, the impact of agglomeration effects on growth prospects of firms is less clear. Because of the heterogeneity of industries, different agglomeration mechanisms, or the way how industrial clusters are identified and spatially delimited, the conclusions which are drawn in the empirical literature on the impact agglomerations and clusters on firm growth are partly contradictory. Hence, FRENKEN, CEFIS and STAM (2011) consider this as one of the key questions in economic geography at large. The study at hand analyses and compares the relationship between firm growth and industrial clusters for 23 industries separately. Therefore, for each firm a micro-geographically defined agglomeration measure is calculated, which is free of the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP), that means it is independent from the chosen regional aggregation level and the shape of the regional boundaries. To assess the impact of related economic as well as knowledge generating activities, the space is modelled by using travel time distances between all actors and a flexible two-parameter log-logistic distance decay function framework based on behavioural assumptions. The resulting model is estimated by using quantile regression techniques to account for the stochastic properties of firm growth rates and to shed light on differences in the relationship between highly growing and declining firms and agglomeration economies. It is found that the firms? growth prospects are not affected or even hampered by the agglomeration of own-industry employment. On the contrary, the impact of proximate scientific publications tends to be positive. In general, better performing firms are less affected by their spatial surrounding, which becomes more influential for declining firms. However, these findings depend on both the kind and the age, i.e. the lifecycle, of an industry. Furthermore, the optimal decay function specifications, which are endogenized in this modelling approach, indicate that the spatial range of agglomeration effects considerably vary both between the industries and variables. Three illustrative cases of industries are discussed in more details.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa13/ERSA2013_paper_00134.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa13p134.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: Nov 2013
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p134

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Welthandelsplatz 1, 1020 Vienna, Austria
Web page: http://www.ersa.org

Related research

Keywords: Firm growth; industrial clusters; agglomeration; MAUP; distance decay function; quantile regression;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Gerke J. Hoogstra & Jouke van Dijk, 2004. "Explaining Firm Employment Growth: Does Location Matter?," Small Business Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 22(3_4), pages 179-192, 04.
  2. Gilles Duranton & Henry G. Overman, 2005. "Testing for Localization Using Micro-Geographic Data," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 72(4), pages 1077-1106.
  3. David L. Rigby & J¸rgen Essletzbichler, 2002. "Agglomeration economies and productivity differences in US cities," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(4), pages 407-432, October.
  4. Lychagin, Sergey & Pinkse, Joris & Slade, Margaret E. & Van Reenen, John, 2010. "Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter?," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 7928, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  5. John R. Baldwin & W. Mark Brown & David L. Rigby, 2010. "Agglomeration Economies: Microdata Panel Estimates From Canadian Manufacturing," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 915-934, December.
  6. Börje Johansson & Johan Klaesson & Michael Olsson, 2003. "Commuters’ non-linear response to time distances," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 315-329, November.
  7. Luigi Guiso & Fabiano Schivardi, 2007. "Spillovers in Industrial Districts," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(516), pages 68-93, 01.
  8. Martijn J. Burger & Frank G. van Oort & Bert van der Knaap, 2010. "A Treatise on the Geographical Scale of Agglomeration Externalities and the MAUP," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 9(1), pages 19-39.
  9. Daan P. van Soest & Shelby Gerking & Frank G. van Oort, 2006. "Spatial Impacts Of Agglomeration Externalities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 881-899.
  10. A. Rodriguez-Pose & Riccardo Crescenzi, 2006. "R&D, spillovers, innovatoin systems and the genesis of regional growth in Europe," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre', Department of Economics - University Roma Tre 0067, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
  11. Martin Andersson & Hans Lööf, 2011. "Agglomeration and productivity: evidence from firm-level data," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 601-620, June.
  12. Richard Harris, 2008. "Models of Regional Growth: Past, Present and Future," SERC Discussion Papers, Spatial Economics Research Centre, LSE 0002, Spatial Economics Research Centre, LSE.
  13. Daniel J Graham, 2009. "Identifying urbanisation and localisation externalities in manufacturing and service industries," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(1), pages 63-84, 03.
  14. Matthias Duschl & Antje Schimke & Thomas Brenner & Dennis Luxen, 2011. "Firm Growth and the Spatial Impact of Geolocated External Factors – Empirical Evidence for German Manufacturing Firms," Working Papers on Innovation and Space, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography 2011-03, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
  15. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Riccardo Crescenzi, 2008. "Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library 23326, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  16. Jacob J De Vries & Peter Nijkamp & Piet Rietveld, 2009. "Exponential or power distance-decay for commuting? An alternative specification," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 41(2), pages 461-480, February.
  17. Giulio Cainelli, 2008. "Spatial Agglomeration, Technological Innovations, and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Italian Industrial Districts," Growth and Change, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, vol. 39(3), pages 414-435.
  18. Frank Neffke & Martin Henning & Ron Boschma & Karl-Johan Lundquist & Lars-Olof Olander, 2011. "The Dynamics of Agglomeration Externalities along the Life Cycle of Industries," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 49-65.
  19. Koen Frenken & Elena Cefis & Erik Stam, 2011. "Industrial dynamics and economic geography: a survey," Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies (ECIS) working paper series, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies (ECIS) 11-07, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies (ECIS).
  20. Michael J. Artis & Ernest Miguelez & Rosina Moreno, 2012. "Agglomeration economies and regional intangible assets: an empirical investigation," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(6), pages 1167-1189, November.
  21. Cassia, Lucio & Colombelli, Alessandra & Paleari, Stefano, 2009. "Firms' growth: Does the innovation system matter?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 211-220, September.
  22. Martin Andersson & Charlie Karlsson, 2007. "Knowledge in Regional Economic Growth—The Role of Knowledge Accessibility," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 129-149.
  23. Otto Raspe & Frank Oort, 2011. "Growth of new firms and spatially bounded knowledge externalities," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 495-518, June.
  24. Glaeser, Edward L & Hedi D. Kallal & Jose A. Scheinkman & Andrei Shleifer, 1992. "Growth in Cities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(6), pages 1126-52, December.
    • Edward L. Glaeser & Hedi D. Kallal & Jose A. Scheinkman & Andrei Shleifer, 1991. "Growth in Cities," NBER Working Papers 3787, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Glaeser, Edward Ludwig & Kallal, Hedi D. & Scheinkman, Jose A. & Shleifer, Andrei, 1992. "Growth in Cities," Scholarly Articles 3451309, Harvard University Department of Economics.
  25. Catherine Beaudry & G. Swann, 2009. "Firm growth in industrial clusters of the United Kingdom," Small Business Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 409-424, April.
  26. Pavitt, Keith, 1984. "Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 343-373, December.
  27. David B. audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann, 2005. "Mansfield's Missing Link: The Impact of Knowledge Spillovers on Firm Growth," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, Springer, vol. 30(2_2), pages 207-210, 01.
  28. Karl Wennberg & Göran Lindqvist, 2010. "The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 221-241, April.
  29. Moshe Buchinsky, 1998. "Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 33(1), pages 88-126.
  30. Joris Pinkse & Margaret E. Slade, 2010. "The Future Of Spatial Econometrics," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 103-117.
  31. Rikard H. Eriksson, 2011. "Localized Spillovers and Knowledge Flows: How Does Proximity Influence the Performance of Plants?," Economic Geography, Clark University, Clark University, vol. 87(2), pages 127-152, 04.
  32. Ron Boschma & Dirk Fornahl, 2011. "Cluster Evolution and a Roadmap for Future Research," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(10), pages 1295-1298, November.
  33. Guido Buenstorf & Steven Klepper, 2009. "Heritage and Agglomeration: The Akron Tyre Cluster Revisited," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(537), pages 705-733, 04.
  34. Koenker,Roger, 2005. "Quantile Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521845731.
  35. Elicia Maine & Daniel Shapiro & Aidan Vining, 2010. "The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 127-146, February.
  36. Jaffe, Adam B, 1989. "Real Effects of Academic Research," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 79(5), pages 957-70, December.
  37. Mercedes Delgado & Michael E. Porter & Scott Stern, 2012. "Clusters, Convergence, and Economic Performance," NBER Working Papers 18250, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  38. David B. Audretsch & Dirk Dohse, 2007. "Location: A Neglected Determinant of Firm Growth," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 79-107, April.
  39. Martin Andersson & Urban Gråsjö, 2009. "Spatial dependence and the representation of space in empirical models," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 159-180, March.
  40. Antony Potter & H. Doug Watts, 2011. "Evolutionary agglomeration theory: increasing returns, diminishing returns, and the industry life cycle," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 417-455, May.
  41. Matthias Buerger & Tom Broekel & Alex Coad, 2012. "Regional Dynamics of Innovation: Investigating the Co-evolution of Patents, Research and Development (R&D), and Employment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 565-582, August.
  42. Otto, Anne & Fornahl, Dirk, 2008. "Long-term growth determinants of young businesses in Germany : effects of regional concentration and specialisation," IAB Discussion Paper, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] 200813, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
  43. Giovanni Dosi & Sébastien Lechevalier & Angelo Secchi, 2010. "Introduction: Interfirm heterogeneity--nature, sources and consequences for industrial dynamics," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 1867-1890, December.
  44. John Baldwin & Desmond Beckstead & W. Mark Brown & David Rigby, 2008. "Agglomeration and the Geography of Localization Economies in Canada," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 117-132.
  45. Henderson, Vernon & Kuncoro, Ari & Turner, Matt, 1995. "Industrial Development in Cities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(5), pages 1067-90, October.
  46. Drucker, Joshua & Feser, Edward, 2012. "Regional industrial structure and agglomeration economies: An analysis of productivity in three manufacturing industries," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 1-14.
  47. Duschl, Matthias & Schimke, Antje & Brenner, Thomas & Luxen, Dennis, 2011. "Firm growth and the spatial impact of geolocated external factors: Empirical evidence for German manufacturing firms," Working Paper Series in Economics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Business Engineering 36, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Business Engineering.
  48. Gregory Spencer & Tara Vinodrai & Meric Gertler & David Wolfe, 2010. "Do Clusters Make a Difference? Defining and Assessing their Economic Performance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 697-715.
  49. Stephen Hymer & Peter Pashigian, 1962. "Firm Size and Rate of Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70, pages 556.
  50. Anders Malmberg & Bo Malmberg & Per Lundequist, 2000. "Agglomeration and firm performance: economies of scale, localisation, and urbanisation among Swedish export firms," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 32(2), pages 305-321, February.
  51. Michael Porter, 2003. "The Economic Performance of Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6-7), pages 549-578.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Matthias Duschl & Thomas Brenner, 2013. "Growth dynamics in regional systems of technological activities – A SVAR approach," Working Papers on Innovation and Space, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography 2013-12, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
  2. Augusto Cerqua & Guido Pellegrini, 2014. "Beyond the SUTVA: how policy evaluations change when we allow for interactions among firms," Working Papers, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS 2/14, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
  3. Matthias Duschl & Antje Schimke & Thomas Brenner & Dennis Luxen, 2014. "Firm Growth and the Spatial Impact of Geolocated External Factors," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Department of Statistics and Economics, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Department of Statistics and Economics, vol. 234(2-3), pages 234-256, April.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa13p134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.