This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Where does success in local development come from?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Irena Djokic ()
Abstract

Key words: participation, ownership This paper presents the case study of City of Samobor where participatory approach has been used in order to create one Strategic document. At the end of 2001 few ambitious people from the City Board of City of Samobor expressed the will to produce Strategic program for period of 10 years. The Institute of Economics offered its? assistance cooperating in the participatory mode. Afterwards, at the beginning of 2002 the Development Board was established and took the role of coordinating body. After public hearing had finished, at the end of 2002 City Council adopted the Program. The Institute of Economics shows in this particular case methodological guidance and ability to manage the process without interference in getting the decisions, what is considered as the main task of City Board. Following the principles of participative methodology the most relevant document for the development of some local community was created. In the first step the Development Board determined four different groups whose task was to undertake the SWOT analysis. This very simple tool both, for those who undertake it and those who read it, in a simplified way shows strengthens, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. For the first time, the City Board of the City of Samobor has been observing itself from introspective point of view, noticing how the things from the inside really look like. The most difficult task was to grade how the City Board functions itself. Be enough objective to comment itself appears as kind of a burden for those who undertake the analysis, and those who benefit from the results, taking into consideration the fact that analysts will be exposed to the critics -positive and negative- of interest groups. After SWOT analysis had been undertaken, the Development Board prepared the workshop which purpose was to gather all the interest groups at one place and to discuss about analysed materials. The outcome of workshop was input to the most important part of the document - the list of necessary projects and measures to be done, and its? excerpt, the Operation plan - list of the tasks with the highest priority level. The proposal of Strategic program was adopted in the mid 2002 and put on public hearing that is the highest possible level of participation. The City Council adopted the final document at the beginning of December 2002, a year after first preliminary discussions about the elaboration of such important document. The implementation phase, where the professionals explicitly show their methodological management, is about to commence. The most relevant results of this case are as follows: - high level of participation - participative methodology is probably one of the most powerful instruments of social control - ownership ? only the feeling of ownership of the document provides its? implementation - contemporary adopting of budget and program ? the practice of adopting budget and program rarely appears in Croatia even though the program is not actually feasible without detailed comparison these two documents - cycling process of adoption of budget ? on a yearly basis taking into account Strategic program and Operation plan - public hearing ? for the first time public hearing is more than a formal, post festum, discussion on document

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www-sre.wu-wien.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa03/cdrom/papers/240.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa03p240.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Aug 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa03p240

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Augasse 2-6, 1090 Vienna, Austria
Web page: http://www.ersa.org

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Gunther Maier).

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? About 1000 journals are listed on RePEc.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-9.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.