Turbulence and productivity; an analysis of 40 Dutch regions in the period 1988-1996
AbstractA series of empirical studies has identified that a pervasive shift in the industrial structure away from large corporations and towards small enterprises has taken place between the mid-1970s and early 1990s. This shift occurred in virtually every single leading industrial country. The questions are whether such a shift is desirable and whether the resulting industrial structure should be promoted or avoided? From an empirical perspective there is growing evidence on the relation between size class distributions and economic performance. However, the question whether this change of the size class structure of industries has influenced economic performance is still underresearched. This has to do with a persistent lack in knowledge concerning questions like who enters and exits, what determines this mobility and what are its effects, in particular on economic performance. Empirical findings so far regarding to the economic effects of turbulence show mixed results. As entry and exit rates are rising, knowledge about the economic effects of turbulence is important for national and regional policymakers, as well as scientists. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of entry and exit of firms on productivity in a regional approach. A model for total factor productivity is estimated using data of 40 Dutch regions for the years 1988 through 1996. The regions can be desaggregated into two separate sectors: manufacturing and services. For the regions and sectors information about firm dynamics (number of entries, exits and existing firms) and economic indicators is available for the years 1988-1996. The findings indicate some positive effects of turbulence on total factor productivity of regions and thereby on productivity and growth at macro-level. In the service sector it was found that turbulence has an upward impact on the TFP growth in a region. It was also found that the effect of turbulence does not occur immediately. The estimates indicate that the effect is measurable after one year but that the effect is more pronounced after two years. No TFP effect of turbulence was found for manufacturing. However, entry and exit processes in the services sector may also affect performance in manufacturing as the sectors are interrelated in many regions.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by European Regional Science Association in its series ERSA conference papers with number ersa02p233.
Date of creation: Aug 2002
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Augasse 2-6, 1090 Vienna, Austria
Web page: http://www.ersa.org
Other versions of this item:
- Henry Nieuwenhuijsen & Niels Bosma, 2002. "Turbulence and Productivity; an analysis of 40 Dutch regions in the period 1988-1996," Scales Research Reports N200205, EIM Business and Policy Research.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Carree, Martin & Thurik, Roy, 1999. "Industrial structure and economic growth," Open Access publications from Maastricht University urn:nbn:nl:ui:27-3946, Maastricht University.
- Nickell, Stephen J, 1996.
"Competition and Corporate Performance,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(4), pages 724-46, August.
- Carree, M.A. & Thurik, A.R., 1998.
"Small firms and economic growth in Europe,"
Open Access publications from Maastricht University
urn:nbn:nl:ui:27-3948, Maastricht University.
- David B. Audretsch & A. Roy Thurik, 2000. "Capitalism and democracy in the 21st Century: from the managed to the entrepreneurial economy," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 17-34.
- Schmitz, James A, Jr, 1989. "Imitation, Entrepreneurship, and Long-run Growth," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 97(3), pages 721-39, June.
- David B. Audretsch & A. Roy Thurik, 1999. "Innovation, Industry Evoluation and Employment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-068/3, Tinbergen Institute.
- Holmes, Thomas J & Schmitz, James A, Jr, 1990.
"A Theory of Entrepreneurship and Its Application to the Study of Business Transfers,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(2), pages 265-94, April.
- Wennekers, Sander & Thurik, Roy, 1999. " Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 27-55, August.
- Andersson, Martin & Braunerhjelm, Pontus & Thulin, Per, 2011.
"Creative Destruction and Productivity – Entrepreneurship by type, sector and sequence,"
2011:8, Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum.
- Andersson, Martin & Braunerhjelm, Pontus & Thulin, Per, 2011. "Creative Destruction and Productivity – entrepreneurship by type, sector and sequence," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 256, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
- André van Stel & Bart Diephuis, 2004.
"Business dynamics and employment growth: A cross-country analysis,"
Scales Research Reports
H200310, EIM Business and Policy Research.
- Andre van Stel & Bart Diephuis, 2004. "Business dynamics and employment growth: a cross-country analysis," Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy 2004-32, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy Group.
- Kristina Nyström, 2009. "Entry, market turbulence and industry employment growth," Empirica, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 293-308, August.
- Braunerhjelm, Pontus, 2010.
"Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth - past experience, current knowledge and policy implications,"
Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation
224, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
- Braunerhjelm, Pontus, 2010. "Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth – Past experiences, current knowledge and policy implications," Working Papers 2010:2, Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum.
- Stel, A.J. van & Suddle, K., 2005.
"The Impact of New Firm Formation on Regional Development in the Netherlands,"
ERS-2005-075-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus Uni.
- André Stel & Kashifa Suddle, 2008. "The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 31-47, January.
- André van Stel & Kashifa Suddle, 2005. "The Impact of New Firm Formation on Regional Development in the Netherlands," Scales Research Reports H200503, EIM Business and Policy Research.
- André van Stel & Kashifa Suddle, 2006. "The Impact of New Firm Formation on Regional Development in the Netherlands," Scales Research Reports H200604, EIM Business and Policy Research.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Gunther Maier).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.