Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Corporate performance and market structure during transition in Hungary

Contents:

Author Info

  • László Halpern

    ()

  • Gábor Kõrösi

    ()

Abstract

ITransition started by a sudden collapse of corporate efficiency, as one important element of the transformational recession. It was followed by a consolidation period, with rapidly increasing efficiency and improving returns to scale. During this period performance was frequently improved by downsizing, thus fast improving corporate performance could not be translated into economic growth. This consolidation period ended in 1995-6, after that mean firm level efficiency only changed slowly. However, the March 1995 stabilization created a favourable environment for substantial investments into the Hungarian corporate sector. These investments largely increased the market share of the better performing firms and sectors, and the massive investments, together with substantial structural improvements brought about rapid economic growth. Market characteristics play a changing role during transition. Import competition, sectoral concentration and efficiency are important explanatory factors for the development of market share of a firm. Heterogeneity can be observed across sectors, according to ownership and to size. The differences, however, are not that large and were diminishing, what makes the hypothesis of the importance of market environment in the determination of corporate performance plausible. One of the major tasks facing a transition economy is to create the competitive environment of a properly functioning market economy. This paper attempts to analyse the relationship of market structure, market imperfections and corporate performance by mark-up pricing. Our results clearly indicate that substantial market imperfections exist in the Hungarian manufacturing sector. These imperfections can yield substantial rents. However, foreign owned firms have larger chance for exploiting market imperfections and can collect larger rents than domestic firms.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.wdi.umich.edu/files/Publications/WorkingPapers/wp606.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan in its series William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series with number 2003-606.

as in new window
Length: 32 pages
Date of creation: 01 Sep 2003
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wdi:papers:2003-606

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 724 E. University Ave, Wyly Hall 1st Flr, Ann Arbor MI 48109
Phone: 734 763-5020
Fax: 734 763 5850
Email:
Web page: http://www.wdi.umich.edu
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Firm in transition economy; efficiency; market structure;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages S71-102, October.
  2. Aghion, Philippe & Harris, Christopher & Vickers, John, 1997. "Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation: An example," European Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-5), pages 771-782, April.
  3. Konings, Jozef & Van Cayseele, Patrick & Warzynski, Frédéric, 2003. "The Effects of Privatization and Competitive Pressure on Firms’ Price-Cost Margins: Micro Evidence from Emerging Economies," Working Papers, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics 03-17, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics.
  4. Philippe Aghion & Nick Bloom & Richard Blundell & Rachel Griffith & Peter Howitt, 2005. "Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 120(2), pages 701-728, May.
  5. Blanchard, O & Kremer, M, 1996. "Disorganization," Working papers, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics 96-30, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics.
  6. Grosfeld, Irena & Tressel, Thierry, 2001. "Competition, Corporate Governance: Substitutes or Complements? Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 2888, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  7. Aghion, Philippe & Dewatripont, Mathias & Rey, Patrick, 1999. "Competition, Financial Discipline and Growth," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(4), pages 825-52, October.
  8. Halpern, László & Kõrösi, Gábor, 2000. "Efficiency and Market Share in the Hungarian Corporate Sector," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 2544, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  9. Aghion, P. & Howitt, P., 1989. "A Model Of Growth Through Creative Destruction," UWO Department of Economics Working Papers, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics 8904, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
  10. Hay, Donald A & Liu, Guy S, 1997. "The Efficiency of Firms: What Difference Does Competition Make?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(442), pages 597-617, May.
  11. Nickell, Stephen J, 1996. "Competition and Corporate Performance," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(4), pages 724-46, August.
  12. Simeon Djankov & Peter Murrell, 2002. "Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 40(3), pages 739-792, September.
  13. Carlin, Wendy & Fries, Steven & Schaffer, Mark E & Seabright, Paul, 2001. "Competition and Enterprise Performance in Transition Economies: Evidence from a Cross-country Survey," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 2840, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  14. N Dryden & Stephen Nickell & D Nicolitsas, 1996. "What Makes Firms Perform Well?," CEP Discussion Papers, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE dp0308, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  15. Philippe Aghion & Wendy Carlin & Mark Schaffer, 2002. "Competition, Innovation and Growth in Transition: Exploring the Interactions between Policies," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan 501, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
  16. Schmidt, Klaus M., 1997. "Managerial Incentives and Product Market Competition," Munich Reprints in Economics, University of Munich, Department of Economics 19772, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
  17. Robert E. Hall, 1986. "The Relation Between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry," NBER Working Papers 1785, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  18. Schmidt, Klaus M, 1997. "Managerial Incentives and Product Market Competition," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 191-213, April.
  19. Kornai, J., 1993. "Transformational Recession; A General Phenomenon Examined Through the Example of Hangary's Development," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research 1648, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
  20. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 1992. "A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction," Scholarly Articles 12490578, Harvard University Department of Economics.
  21. Blundell, Richard & Griffith, Rachel & van Reenen, John, 1999. "Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms," Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 529-54, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wdi:papers:2003-606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laurie Gendron).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.