Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Economic valuation and the natural world

Contents:

Author Info

  • Pearce, David

Abstract

Economic valuation is controversial largely because its purpose has not been clearly conveyed to non-economists. The purpose of valuation of the natural world is to elicit measures of human preferences for, or against, environmental change. As a procedure, it thus faces two immediate limitations. First, economic values are not the same as intrinsic values - values in things rather than values of things. Economic valuation makes no claim to measure intrinsic values, although through the concept of existence value it may be capable of capturing human perceptions of intrinsic value. Second, measuring preferences focuses on efficiency gains and losses from environmental change. It says little about the distribution of costs and benefits within a time period or between time periods. Within a time period, the use of efficiency gains and losses as a guide to policy or project evaluation assumes that the prevailing distribution of income is socially acceptable, since it is that distribution which weights the measures of willingness to pay. Between time periods, the use of another efficiency concept - the discount rate - biases the outcomes of evaluation in favor of the present, and against future, generations where future costs and benefits are both distant and significant. But economic valuation is useful in several contexts. Project and program appraisal cannot be comprehensive or adequate without it. National environmental policy priorities will be better informed if economic values are known with some degree of certainty. The entire objective of sustainable development almost certainly cannot be interpreted without some idea of the value of environmental services and assets. Empirical work on valuation remains limited, even in the developed world. It is fairly new in the developing world, although many project evaluations have used some form of indirect valuation. Its importance for the development process is that revealed economic values for environmental conservation and environmentally improving projects and policies have often been found to be large. Valuation demonstrates that there is an economic case for protecting the environment and can help improve decision making. In so doing, it could make public choices more cost-efficient, thus allowing limited public income to be optimally spent.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1992/10/01/000009265_3961003110152/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 988.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 31 Oct 1992
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:988

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20433
Phone: (202) 477-1234
Email:
Web page: http://www.worldbank.org/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Energy and Environment; Climate Change; Economic Theory&Research; Environmental Economics&Policies; Health Economics&Finance;

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Nordhaus, William D, 1991. "A Sketch of the Economics of the Greenhouse Effect," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(2), pages 146-50, May.
  2. Bergstrom, John C. & Stoll, John R. & Titre, John P. & Wright, Vernon L., 1990. "Economic value of wetlands-based recreation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 129-147, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Nicola Lansdell & Lata Gangadharan, 2003. "Comparing Travel Cost Models And The Precision Of Their Consumer Surplus Estimates: Albert Park And Maroondah Reservoir," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 399-417, December.
  2. Easter, K. William & Archibald, Sandra O., 1998. "Benefit-Cost Analysis In U.S. Environmental Regulatory Decisions," Conference Papers 14475, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
  3. Bernard M.S. van Praag & B.E. Baarsma, 2000. "The Shadow Price of Aircraft Noise Nuisance," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-004/3, Tinbergen Institute.
  4. Catalino, Alejandro Herrera & Lizardo, Magdalena, 2004. "Agriculture, Environmental Services and Agro-Tourism in the Dominican Republic," eJADE: electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization, Agricultural and Development Economics Division, vol. 1(1).
  5. Tisdell, Clem & Wilson, Clevo, 2002. "World Heritage Listing of Australian Natural Sites: Tourism Stimulus and Its Economic Value," Economic Analysis and Policy (EAP), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Economics and Finance, vol. 32(2), pages 27-49, June Spec.
  6. Raffaello Gervigni, 1998. "Incremental Cost in the Convention on Biological Diversity," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(2), pages 217-241, March.
  7. Alessandra Arcuri, 2005. "A Different Reason for “De-Coasing†Environmental Law and Economics," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 225-246, September.
  8. Voxi Heinrich S. Amavilah, 2005. "The National Wealth of Selected Countries - A Descriptive Essay," Development and Comp Systems 0508007, EconWPA.
  9. Oliver Fromm, 2000. "Ecological Structure and Functions of Biodiversity as Elements of Its Total Economic Value," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 16(3), pages 303-328, July.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.