When agricultural production is taxed, the system of producer prices, transport logistics, and decisions on investments in transport for exports must be considered together. Many African states raise revenue by taxing export crops. A common tool for this purpose is marketing boards. Marketing boards purchase crops at depots established near areas of cultivation, at prices that yield a profit to the board. The boards also arrange for processing and the transport of the product from depots to port. The cost of transport to the farmer, given the price offered for his crop at the depot, will affect his decision on production and on the use of his own transport resources. The author evaluates the benefits available from alternative uses of the instruments available to the marketing board. Returns to transport investments are largest under pan-territorial pricing, lower under optimal pricing, and the least under a pure export tax. The author also examines different patterns of depot location. Unless depots are densely spaced, farmers may deliver their crops to the depot nearest to them. The paper demonstrates the interdependence of agricultural pricing policy and marketing board logistics with transport use and the demand for transport investments.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: