IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/2095.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ten years of post-socialist transition lessons for policy reform

Author

Listed:
  • Koldko, Grzegorz W.

Abstract

It is naive to believe that a market economy can be introduced by"shock therapy,"the author argues. In the several cases when it has been attempted, it has brought problems. A market economy requires adequate institutions and appropriate behavior, both of which can be introduced only gradually because they require new organizations, new laws, and changes in behavior of various economic entities. In 1989 influential financial organizations, political bodies, and professional economists seemed to agree - the so-called Washington consensus - on the main points of economic policy reform. Although the economic policies underlying that consensus were developed with no concern for post-socialist transformation, they have significantly influences economic thought and action in Eastern Europe and the countries of the former Soviet Union. And because those policies were not designed for the overhaul of post-socialist economies. The have failed, especially since they have not yet brought sustainable growth. A new post-Washington consensus is developing. Based on lessons from experience so far. Post-socialist occurrences are also contribution to developing policy reorientation. Among realities policymakers must recognize: A) Above all, appropriate institutional arrangements are needed for growth. B) Institution-building by its very nature must be gradual. C) the size of government is less important that the quality of government policy and how the government changes. D) If the formation of institutions is left to spontaneous forces unleashed by liberalized markets, the vacuum will be filled by informal institutions. E) The judiciary system must be transformed to serve the market economy. F) Deregulating the post-socialist economy requires shifting competence and power from central to local governments. G) The development of nongovernmental organizations must be accelerated. H) Government concern about equitable growth and income policy is important during the transition. I) With the support of international financial institutions, countries must monitor and control short-term capital liberalization. J) The Bretton Woods organizations should reconsider their policies toward transition economies - and should especially provide more support for institution-buildings and equitable growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Koldko, Grzegorz W., 1999. "Ten years of post-socialist transition lessons for policy reform," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2095, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:2095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1999/07/22/000094946_99041308525126/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William S. Sessions, 1990. "Washington," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 57-59, July.
    2. Maxwell J. Fry, 1993. "The Fiscal Abuse of Central Banks," IMF Working Papers 1993/058, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Burgess, Robin & Stern, Nicholas, 1993. "Taxation and Development," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 762-830, June.
    4. Dariusz K. Rosati, 1994. "Output decline during transition from plan to market: a reconsideration," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 2(4), pages 419-441, December.
    5. Grzegorz W. Kolodko, 1989. "Reform, Stabilization Policies, and Economic Adjustment in Poland," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-1989-051, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laura Taylor & Mary Wrenn, 2003. "Forging new relationships: Social capital in the transistion," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Weixuan Chen & Ali Cheshmehzangi & Eugenio Mangi & Timothy Heath, 2022. "Implementations of China’s New-Type Urbanisation: A Comparative Analysis between Targets and Practices of Key Elements’ Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Marangos, John, 2009. "What happened to the Washington Consensus? The evolution of international development policy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 197-208, January.
    4. Lissitsa, Alexej & Odening, Martin, 2001. "Effizienz und totale Faktor-produktivitat in der ukrainischen Landwirtschaft im Transformationsprozess," Working Paper Series 7391, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    5. John Marangos, 2002. "A post Keynesian critique of privatization policies in transition economies," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(5), pages 573-589.
    6. Abuselidze, George, 2019. "Анализ На Формирането И Прилагането На Бюджетни Политики, Осигуряващи Социално-Икономическото Развитие На Административнотериториалните Единици [Analysis of the formation and use of budgetary polic," MPRA Paper 99889, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. John Marangos, 2009. "The Evolution Of The Term ‘Washington Consensus’," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 350-384, April.
    8. Jan Svejnar & Milica Uvalic, 2009. "The Czech Transition: The Importance of Microeconomic Fundamentals," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2009-17, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. George Abuselidze, 2019. "Analysis Of The Formation And Use Of Budgetary Policies Ensuring The Socio-Economic Development Of Territorial Units," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 2 Year 20, pages 3-15.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kolodko, Grzegorz W., 2000. "A posztszocialista átalakulás tíz éve a gazdaságpolitikai reformokkal kapcsolatos tanulságok [Ten years of post-socialist transition: the lessons for policy reforms]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 197-214.
    2. Grzegorz W. Kołodko, 2019. "Uwarunkowania i długookresowe implikacje Strategii dla Polski," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 65-93.
    3. De Bonis, Valeria, 1997. "Regional integration and factor income taxation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1849, The World Bank.
    4. Cohen, Joseph N., 2008. "Managing the Faustian bargain: monetary autonomy in the pursuit of development in Eastern Europe and Latin America," MPRA Paper 22435, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Gustavo Marrero, 2010. "Tax-mix, public spending composition and growth," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 29-51, February.
    6. Cohen, Joseph N, 2010. "Neoliberalism’s relationship with economic growth in the developing world: Was it the power of the market or the resolution of financial crisis?," MPRA Paper 24527, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Jean-Paul Fitoussi & Francesco Saraceno, 2004. "The Brussels-Frankfurt-Washington Consensus. Old and New Tradeoffs in Economics," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2004-02, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    8. Godin, M. & Hindriks, J., 2015. "A Review of Critical Issues on Tax Design and Tax Administration in a Global Economy and Developing Countries," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015028, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    9. Abdourahmane Ndiaye, 2008. "Économie solidaire, insertion et marchés transitionnels du travail territorialisés. Quelques conclusions tirées de l'étude de cas du PLIE des Graves," Post-Print halshs-00596749, HAL.
    10. Kilby, Christopher, 2005. "World Bank lending and regulation," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 384-407, December.
    11. Mirco Tonin, 2014. "Reporting import tariffs (and other taxes)," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 21(1), pages 153-173, February.
    12. Tirachini, Alejandro & Proost, Stef, 2021. "Transport taxes and subsidies in developing countries: The effect of income inequality aversion," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    13. Svejnar, Jan, 2007. "China in Light of the Performance of Central and East European Economies," CEPR Discussion Papers 6320, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Céline DE QUATREBARBES & Luc SAVARD & Dorothée BOCCANFUSO, 2011. "Can the removal of VAT Exemptions support the Poor? The Case of Niger," Working Papers 201106, CERDI.
    15. von Soest, Christian, 2006. "Measuring the Capability to Raise Revenue: Process and Output Dimensions and Their Application to the Zambia Revenue Authority," GIGA Working Papers 35, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    16. Sławomir Bukowski, 2011. "Economic and Monetary Union – Current Fiscal Disturbances and the Future," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 17(3), pages 274-287, August.
    17. Gersbach, Hans & Siemers, Lars-H. R., 2010. "Land Reforms And Economic Development," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 527-547, September.
    18. Tamilina, Larysa, 2014. "Податкова Політика Періоду Непу Та Індустріалізації [The politics of taxation in Ukraine during the new economic policy and industrialization]," MPRA Paper 96497, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Bachas, Pierre & Gadenne, Lucie & Jensen, Anders, 2020. "Informality, Consumption Taxes and Redistribution," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1277, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    20. Bourguignon, Francois & Rogers, F. Halsey, 2007. "Distributional effects of educational improvements: Are we using the wrong model?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 735-746, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:2095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.