Developmentalism, socialism, and free market reform : three decades of income distribution in Chile
AbstractAfter relatively stable income distribution in the 1960s, and a redistribution toward low income groups under Allende, income shares declined for the 40 percent of the population (low and lower middle income groups) under Pinochet. The top 20 percent benefited most from the income shift away from low income groups. Under Aylwin, the income share of the bottom 40 percent returned to previous levels, but the share of the top 20 percent remained above its pre-1973 historical average. The authors show that in the first years of market oriented reform income for the poor deteriorated, chiefly because of persistent unemployment and a squeeze on the real minimum wage and other wage categories. The share of the middle class (the third and fourth quintiles) in national income declined by an average 3 percentage points during 1974-89 - because of cutbacks in public sector employment and steadily decling public sector wages. Recession with high unemployment especially hurts the poor, and growth does not equalize conditions until it strengthens labor markets. Only when Chile's economy approached full capacity, when wages rose and unemployment dropped to a historic low in the early 1990s, did income distribution for the poor improve. If growth continues and investment grows even faster, as in the past two years, the labor market will remain tighter than in any period in the past 30 years and distribution may improve significantly. Is a liberalized economy compatible with social equity? The authors show that initially income distribution deteriorated under reform, chiefly because of macroeconomic crises and subsequent higher unemployment and depressed real wages. However, it is not clear that trade liberalization and deregulation are socially regressive, though the market outcomes that dominate in a liberalized economy may generate a failure in the labor market that social policy should correct. There is more potential for improving the quality of social services today than in the past, but targeting of social services should be designed to prevent the"poverty trap". Targeting and social policies should be designed to encourage personal efforts to escape poverty and to avoid alienating middle income groups.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by The World Bank in its series Policy Research Working Paper Series with number 1188.
Date of creation: 30 Sep 1993
Date of revision:
Environmental Economics&Policies; Economic Theory&Research; Inequality; Governance Indicators; Poverty Impact Evaluation;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Galor, Oded & Zeira, Joseph, 1993.
"Income Distribution and Macroeconomics,"
Review of Economic Studies,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 35-52, January.
- Felipe Larraín & Rodrigo Vergara, 1992. "Distribución del Ingreso, Inversión y Crecimiento," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 29(87), pages 207-228.
- Blinder, Alan S & Esaki, Howard Y, 1978. "Macroeconomic Activity and Income Distribution in the Postwar United States," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 60(4), pages 604-09, November.
- Rodrik, Dani & Alesina, Alberto, 1994.
"Distributive Politics and Economic Growth,"
4551798, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Torsten Persson & Guido Tabellini, 1991.
"Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence,"
NBER Working Papers
3599, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 1991. "Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 581, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Torsten Persson and Guido Tabellini., 1991. "Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence," Economics Working Papers 91-155, University of California at Berkeley.
- Persson, Torsten & Tabellini, Guido, 1991. "Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt00x7n68q, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Bourguignon, Francois & De Melo, Jaime & Suwa, Akiko, 1991. "Modeling the effects of adjustment programs on income distribution," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 19(11), pages 1527-1544, November.
- Lindert, Peter H. & Williamson, Jeffrey G., 1985. "Growth, equality, and history," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 341-377, October.
- Meller, Patricio & O'ryan, Raul & Solimano, Andres, 1996. "Growth, equity, and the environment in Chile: Issues and evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 255-272, February.
- Baer, Werner & Maloney, William, 1997. "Neoliberalism and income distribution in Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 311-327, March.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Roula I. Yazigi).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.