IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vor/issues/2013-6-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Intuition- An Objective In Taxonomy Of Research

Author

Listed:
  • Subbarayan Peri

Abstract

Intuition is the key concept in the research process and research behavior. It belongs to higher order learning. There are cases of intuition in the world in abundance and in all walks of life. Intuition differs from insight. It's a quality indicator of the research behavior and research products. Learning science did appreciable advancements in 'learning by teaching', but none in 'learning by research'. Intuition could be studied as an objective in the taxonomy of research. There are three sources of literature in support: i) A school of ancient Indian philosophers, Vedantins studied niddhidhyasana and practiced in their curriculum. Niddhidhyasana via. upsana is the technique of inculcation of intuition. ii) Blooms and Flanders could show a way that intuition to be an objective of research, and finally iii) computational models of learning also support it. Key words: Research Behaviors (RB), Learning by teaching (LT), Learning by research (LR), Taxonomy of Research (ToR), Niddhidhyasana, Upasana (meditative intuition), Tapah, Lower order learning (LoL), Higher order Learning (HoL).

Suggested Citation

  • Subbarayan Peri, 2013. "Intuition- An Objective In Taxonomy Of Research," Working papers 2013-6-1, Voice of Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:vor:issues:2013-6-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.voiceofresearch.org/doc/Jun-2013/Jun-2013_1.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Subbarayan Peri, 2012. "Psychological Foundations Of The Science Of Research," Working papers 2012-3-11, Voice of Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vor:issues:2013-6-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Avdhesh Jha (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.