This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The impact of cultural resemblance on management control of supplier relations: longitudinal evidence in the automotive industry

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Pernot, E.
Roodhooft, F. (Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This study explores the impact of cultural resemblance on the management control system (MCS) of supplier relationships. Although MCSs are contingent on situational characteristics and this contingency fit is associated with good performance, it remains unclear whether cultural resemblance between manufacturer and supplier contributes to the speed of MCS change, so that temporary misfits due to changing circumstances are less likely to occur. To illustrate this effect of cultural resemblance on MCS dynamics, we perform a twofold longitudinal case study of similar automotive manufacturer-supplier relationships that differ with respect to cultural resemblance. Findings show that in case of high cultural resemblance, the speed of increasing the level of management control is higher. That way, upcoming contingency changes are appropriately anticipated by an increase in the level of management control, already before contingencies actually change. Consequently, a MCS misfit and potential decreasing operational performance are avoided. Oppositely, in case of low cultural resemblance, adjusting the MCS to changing circumstances requires more time. This leads to a temporal MCS misfit that contributes to escalating operational difficulties, until the MCS is changed. Furthermore, the case data show three mechanisms by which cultural resemblance enhances management control according to earlier findings in the literature: increased communication on the initiative of the supplier, proper information exchange and trust enhancing signals. Finally, our findings show that the manufacturer influences supplier decision making to install a manager of the manufacturer’s choice and that way influences the supplier’s culture.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.vlerick.com/en/9635-VLK/version/default/part/AttachmentData/data/vlgms-wp-2008-18.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School in its series Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series with number 2008-18.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 58 pages
Date of creation: 25 Oct 2008
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:vlg:vlgwps:2008-18

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Reep 1, 9000 Gent
Phone: +32 9 210 98 99
Fax: +32 9 210 97 00
Email:
Web page: http://www.vlerick.com
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Isabelle Vandenbroere).

Related research
Keywords: Management control; Trust; Performance; Organizational culture; Competing Values Framework; Supplier relationships; Manufacturing; Contingency theory; Case research; Automotive;

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Cooper, Robin & Slagmulder, Regine, 2004. "Interorganizational cost management and relational context," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-26, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Kamminga, Pieter E. & Van der Meer-Kooistra, Jeltje, 2007. "Management control patterns in joint venture relationships: A model and an exploratory study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-2), pages 131-154. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Gerdin, Jonas & Greve, Jan, 2004. "Forms of contingency fit in management accounting research--a critical review," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3-4), pages 303-326. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F. & Nagar, Venkatesh & Rajan, Madhav V., 1999. "Supplier selection, monitoring practices, and firm performance," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 253-281, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Bhimani, Alnoor, 2003. "A study of the emergence of management accounting system ethos and its influence on perceived system success," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 523-548, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Gunasekaran, A. & Patel, C. & McGaughey, Ronald E., 2004. "A framework for supply chain performance measurement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 333-347, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Dekker, Henri C., 2008. "Partner selection and governance design in interfirm relationships," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 915-941. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Organizational culture and performance measurement systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 77-103, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Rowe, Casey & Birnberg, Jacob G. & Shields, Michael D., 2008. "Effects of organizational process change on responsibility accounting and managers' revelations of private knowledge," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 164-198. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Spekle, Roland F., 2001. "Explaining management control structure variety: a transaction cost economics perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 26(4-5), pages 419-441. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  11. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  12. Dekker, Henri C., 2004. "Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 27-49, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also indexes books.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-16.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.