This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
How do early stage high technology investors select their investments? Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Clarysse, B. ()
Knockaert, M. ()
Lockett, A. (Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School)
This study examines the selection behaviour of 68 European early stage high tech VCs. In particular, we examine whether or not these VCs exhibit heterogeneity in their selection behaviour. To examine these issues we employ a conjoint analysis methodology. Our results indicate that VCs exhibit substantial heterogeneity in investment selection behaviour. Employing a cluster analysis three types of investors emerge: those who focus on technology, those who focus on finance and those who focus on people. We then examine the drivers of these differences, being the sectoral focus, the sources of funds and the human capital of the investment manager.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Paper provided by Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School in its series Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series with number
2005-21.
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML ,
plain text ,
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote),
ReDIF
Length: 40 pages
Date of creation: 18 Nov 2005Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:vlg:vlgwps:2005-21Contact details of provider: Postal: Reep 1, 9000 Gent Phone: +32 9 210 98 99 Fax: +32 9 210 97 00 Email: Web page: http://www.vlerick.be More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Isabelle Vandenbroere).
Keywords: This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports :
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: Macmillan, Ian C. & Zemann, Lauriann & Subbanarasimha, P. N., 1987.
"Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 123-137.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Hellmann, Thomas, 2002.
"A theory of strategic venture investing ,"
Journal of Financial Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 285-314, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Shepherd, Dean A. & Zacharakis, Andrew & Baron, Robert A., 2003.
"VCs' decision processes: Evidence suggesting more experience may not always be better ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 381-401, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Murray, Gordon C. & Lott, Jonathan, 1995.
"Have UK venture capitalists a bias against investment in new technology-based firms? ,"
Research Policy ,
Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 283-299, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Shepherd, Dean A. & Zacharakis, Andrew, 2002.
"Venture capitalists' expertise: A call for research into decision aids and cognitive feedback ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-20, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Baum, Joel A. C. & Silverman, Brian S., 2004.
"Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 411-436, May.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Zacharakis, Andrew L. & Meyer, G. Dale, 2000.
"The potential of actuarial decision models: Can they improve the venture capital investment decision? ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 323-346, July.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Elango, B. & Fried, Vance H. & Hisrich, Robert D. & Polonchek, Amy, 1995.
"How venture capital firms differ ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 157-179, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Macmillan, Ian C. & Siegel, Robin & Narasimha, P. N. Subba, 1985.
"Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 119-128.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Riquelme, Hernan & Rickards, Tudor, 1992.
"Hybrid conjoint analysis: An estimation probe in new venture decisions ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 7(6), pages 505-518, November.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Zacharakis, Andrew L. & Meyer, G. Dale, 1998.
"A lack of insight: do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process? ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 57-76, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Lockett, Andy & Murray, Gordon & Wright, Mike, 2002.
"Do UK venture capitalists still have a bias against investment in new technology firms ,"
Research Policy ,
Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 1009-1030, August.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Mayer, Colin & Schoors, Koen & Yafeh, Yishay, 2002.
"Sources of Funds and Investment Activities of Venture Capital Funds: Evidence from Germany, Israel, Japan and the UK ,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
3340, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: Hisrich, Robert D. & Jankowicz, A. D., 1990.
"Intuition in venture capital decisions: An exploratory study using a new technique ,"
Journal of Business Venturing ,
Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 49-62, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full
references
Access and
download statistics Did you know? A tutorial is available.
This page was last updated on 2008-9-11.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .