The binary logistic regression or logit link model is commonly used to test for racial disparate treatment in fairlending studies undertaken by government agencies, including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Reserve Board (FRB). Ensuring race neutrality in lending remains a concern of regulators and consumer advocates. Improving the understanding of any shortcomings of either bank internal models or regulatory agency models will enable those participants in the mortgage industry to better serve the needs of consumers. We explore this issue using five bank studies undertaken by the OCC. We consider the impact of the logit link assumption, as this determines how race affects the likelihood of loan approval, by moving to three other links: probit, gompit and complementary log log; the latter two are examples of asymmetric links. As our data sets have been obtained using stratified sampling procedures, which has been typical at the OCC, rather than being drawn via simple random sampling, moving away from the logit link complicates estimation; it is no longer possible to use a standard estimation command with an adjustment for stratum effects. Our results reveal that the choice of link function, despite exhibiting similar sample fit, can influence findings of disparate treatment at the nominal level of significance commonly accepted as the legal standard. We also find that the use of a resampling method, which aims to better approximate the finite sample null distribution, for obtaining p-values typically leads to support for discrimination more often than arises from use of the standard normal approximation.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Department of Economics, University of Victoria in its series Econometrics Working Papers with number
0516.
Length: 36 pages Date of creation: 14 Oct 2005 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:vic:vicewp:0516
Note: ISSN 1485-6441 Contact details of provider: Postal: PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada, V8W 2Y2 Phone: (250)721-8540 Fax: (250)721-6214 Web page: http://web.uvic.ca/econ More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (David Giles).
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: