Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Do redistributive schemes reduce inequality between individuals?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Eugenio Peluso

    ()
    (Dipartimento di Scienze economiche (Università di Verona))

  • Alain Trannoy

    ()
    (EHESS, GREQAM-IDEP)

Abstract

Redistribution schemes (taxes or benefits) are generally performed at the household level. The issue is to know whether intra-household inequality magnifies or hampers the redistributive effect of the transfers, when the policy-maker focuses on the inequality at the individual level. Depending on the type of the transfer, three properties capturing the idea that the more wealthy the household is, the more unequally it behaves, have been shown to matter. In the moving away approach, the deviation with the equal split make a difference, in the star-shaped approach, the average share counts while the marginal share is relevant for concavity. We complete the analysis by showing how these properties of the intra-household allocation may be recovered through a bargaining model of the household. Then, the DARA and DRRA properties of the utility function emerge as the key conditions for the recovery.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://dse.univr.it/RePEc/ver/Wpaper/WP26.pdf
File Function: First version
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by University of Verona, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 26.

as in new window
Length: 18
Date of creation: Sep 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ver:wpaper:26

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Vicolo Campofiore, 2 - I-37129 Verona
Phone: +390458028097
Fax: +390458028486
Email:
Web page: http://www.dse.univr.it
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Inequality; Intra-household Allocation; Household bargaining; Lorenz curve; Taxation schemes.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Eugenio Peluso & Alain Trannoy, 2004. "Does Less Inequality among Households Mean Less Inequality among Individuals?," IDEP Working Papers, Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France 0407, Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France, revised Jun 2004.
  2. Moyes, Patrick, 1989. "Some classes of functions that preserve the inequality and welfare orderings of income distributions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 347-359, December.
  3. Roth, Alvin E & Rothblum, Uriel G, 1982. "Risk Aversion and Nash's Solution for Bargaining Games with Risky Outcomes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 50(3), pages 639-47, May.
  4. Haddad, Lawrence & Kanbur, Ravi, 1989. "How serious is the neglect of intrahousehold inequality ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 296, The World Bank.
  5. Yaari, Menahem E, 1977. "A Note on Separability and Quasiconcavity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 45(5), pages 1183-86, July.
  6. Ravallion, Martin, 2001. "Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Looking Beyond Averages," World Development, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1803-1815, November.
  7. Helen Couprie & Eugenio Peluso & Alain Trannoy, 2005. "From household to individual’s welfare: does the Lorenz criteria still hold? Theory and Evidence from French Data," Department of Economics University of Siena, Department of Economics, University of Siena 469, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
  8. Le Breton, Michel & Moyes, Patrick & Trannoy, Alain, 1996. "Inequality Reducing Properties of Composite Taxation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 71-103, April.
  9. Kanbur, Ravi & Haddad, Lawrence, 1994. "Are Better Off Households More Unequal or Less Unequal?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 445-58, July.
  10. Eichhorn, Wolfgang & Funke, Helmut & Richter, Wolfram F., 1984. "Tax progression and inequality of income distribution," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 127-131, October.
  11. Dollar, David & Kraay, Aart, 2002. " Growth Is Good for the Poor," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 195-225, September.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ver:wpaper:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael Reiter).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.