IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ven/wpaper/201420.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The opportunity costs of public funds concepts and issues

Author

Listed:
  • J�r�me Massiani

    (Department of Economics, University Of Venice C� Foscari)

  • Gabriele Picco

Abstract

This paper reviews the main conceptual issues regarding the notion of Opportunity Cost of Public Funds (OCPF) and its use in normative economics. This notion occupies only a marginal and sometimes anecdotal role in the public economic literature and appears to be too often used without the definitional unambiguousness that would make it helpful for economic analysis. This situation is unsatisfactory considering the importance of (some of) the mechanisms described by the concept and the magnitude of these effects that are such as to heavily impact any budgetary practice. We find that among the mechanisms that economists call "opportunity costs" the deadweight loss and, to a lesser extent, administrative costs seem to be the most relevant, whereas the impact of the crowding out is more discussible. We also analyze how the question of opportunity costs is contingent upon some hypothesis about the financing mechanism of the public expenditures and we suggest that the most likely situation is the one where public expenses are financed through the eviction of other alternative uses of the public funding. We also provide a review of available quantifications and recommendations to the practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • J�r�me Massiani & Gabriele Picco, 2014. "The opportunity costs of public funds concepts and issues," Working Papers 2014:20, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
  • Handle: RePEc:ven:wpaper:2014:20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.unive.it/pag/fileadmin/user_upload/dipartimenti/economia/doc/Pubblicazioni_scientifiche/working_papers/2014/WP_DSE_massiani_picco_20_14.pdf
    File Function: First version, anno
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristensen, Søren Rud & Siciliani, Luigi & Sutton, Matt, 2016. "Optimal price-setting in pay for performance schemes in health care," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 57-77.
    2. Geir H. M. Bjertnæs, 2020. "The marginal (opportunity) cost of public funds," Discussion Papers 925, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    3. Gerritse, Michiel & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2018. "Does federal contracting spur development? Federal contracts, income, output, and jobs in US cities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 121-135.
    4. Hisham A. Shehadeh & Mohd Yamani Idna Idris & Ismail Ahmedy & Roziana Ramli & Noorzaily Mohamed Noor, 2018. "The Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm Based on Sperm Fertilization Procedure (MOSFP) Method for Solving Wireless Sensor Networks Optimization Problems in Smart Grid Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-35, January.
    5. Jérôme Massiani, 2020. "Towards Improved Guidelines for Cost–Benefit Analysis of Sport and Cultural Events," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(3), pages 270-289, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Opportunity costs of public funds; public expenditure; project evaluation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ven:wpaper:2014:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Geraldine Ludbrook (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dsvenit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.