Fahmy and Kandil [2003] use a cointegration approach to test for the Fisher effect in US interest rates during the 1980s and early 1990s. Here, I argue that even if nominal interest rates and inflation rates do obey integrated processes, cointegration of these two processes is not a sufficient condition for the Fisher effect to hold as it is consistent with any theory implying a stationary real interest rate. As the Fisher effect ex post implies that nominal interest rates embody an optimal inflation forecast, the sufficient condition for it to hold is the unpredictability of the implied inflation forecast error. This condition may be tested using the signal extraction framework of Durlauf and Hall [1988, 1989].
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)