Rationalizing Seven Consumption-Saving Puzzles in a Unified Framework
AbstractEmpirical evidence suggests that it may cost time, effort, and resources to properly implement a saving plan, though such cost may differ across individual consumers. We document seven facts on macroeconomic consumption and saving over the life cycle, and we enrich a simple life-cycle model by costly saving implementation to explain these facts. This friction is the sole and common mechanism in our model for rationalizing this series of facts, as the model abstracts from all existing mechanisms that are known to help explain some of them. The implementation costs in our model are small, yet they help resolve these macroeconomic consumption and saving puzzles in a simple and unified way.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Vanderbilt University Department of Economics in its series Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers with number 0716.
Date of creation: Oct 2007
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/econ/wparchive/index.html
Overconfidence; consumption; life cycle; time inconsistency; hump shape; elasticity of intertemporal substitution ;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
- D91 - Microeconomics - - Intertemporal Choice - - - Intertemporal Household Choice; Life Cycle Models and Saving
- E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2007-11-17 (All new papers)
- NEP-DGE-2007-11-17 (Dynamic General Equilibrium)
- NEP-MAC-2007-11-17 (Macroeconomics)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- James Feigenbaum & Frank N. Caliendo & Emin Gahramanov, 2009.
"Optimal Irrational Behavior,"
2009_01, Deakin University, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance.
- Feigenbaum, James & Caliendo, Frank N. & Gahramanov, Emin, 2011. "Optimal irrational behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 285-303, March.
- James Feigenbaum, 2008. "Optimal Irrational Behavior," Working Papers, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Economics 368, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2008.
- James Feigenbaum & Frank N. Caliendo & Emin Gahramanov, 2009. "Optimal Irrational Behavior," Working Papers 200901, Utah State University, Department of Economics and Finance.
- T. Findley & Frank Caliendo, 2008. "The behavioral justification for public pensions: a survey," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 409-425, October.
- Shantanu Bagchi, 2011. "Can overconfidence explain the consumption hump?," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 41-70, January.
- Frank N. Caliendo & Emin Gahramanov, 2008. "Hunting the Unobservables for Optimal Social Security: A General Equilibrium Approach," Economics Series 2008_10, Deakin University, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John P. Conley).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.