IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/van/wpaper/0046.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Determining the Optimal Sample Size for Contingent Valuation Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • William J. Vaughan

    (Inter-American Development Bank)

  • Clifford S. Russell

    (Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University)

  • Arthur H. Darling

    (Inter-American Development Bank)

Abstract

Fundamentally, this paper is about the value of information. Whenever a cost-benefit analysis has to be undertaken using benefits that are estimated from household survey data the size of the survey sample must be specified. The most obvious case in the valuation of environmental amenity improvements through contingent valuation (CV) surveys of willingness to pay. One of the first questions that has to be answered in the survey design process is "How many subjects should be interviewed?" The answer can have significant implications for the cost of project preparation. Traditionally, the sample size question has been answered in an ad hoc way either be dividing an exogenously fixed survey budget by the cost per interview or employing some variant of a standard statistical tolerance interval formula. Neither of these approaches can balance the gains to additional sampling effort against the extra interviewing costs. A better answer if not to be found in the environmental economics literature, though it can be developed by adapting a Bayesian decision analysis approach from business statistics. The paper explains and illustrates, with a worked example, the rationale for and mechanics of a sequential Bayesian optimization technique, which is applicable when there is some monetary payoff to alternative courses of action that can be linked to the sample data. In this sense, unlike pure valuation studies that are unconnected to a policy decision, investigators who use contingent valuation results directly in cost-benefit analysis have a hidden advantage that can be exploited to optimize the sample size. The advantage lies in the link between willingness to pay and the decision variable, the net present value of the prospective investment. The core objective of the paper is practical. Readers without a statistical background can easily implement the method. An Appendix shows how, with just six key pieces of information, anyone can solve the optimal sample size problem in a spreadsheet. An automated spreadsheet algorithm is available from the authors on request. To run the program all the users has to do is enter the key data and then activate a macro that automatically computes the optimum number of additional observations needed to augment any initial "small" survey sample.

Suggested Citation

  • William J. Vaughan & Clifford S. Russell & Arthur H. Darling, 2000. "Determining the Optimal Sample Size for Contingent Valuation Surveys," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0046, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:van:wpaper:0046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/VUECON/vu00-w46.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loubière, Sandrine & Taylor, Owen & Tinland, Aurelie & Vargas-Moniz, Maria & O'Shaughnessy, Branagh & Bokszczanin, Anna & Kallmen, Hakan & Bernad, Roberto & Wolf, Judith & Santinello, Massimo & Loundo, 2020. "Europeans’ willingness to pay for ending homelessness: A contingent valuation study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Choi, Hyunhong & Lee, Jeongeun & Koo, Yoonmo, 2023. "Value of different electric vehicle charging facility types under different availability situations: A South Korean case study of electric vehicle and internal combustion engine vehicle owners," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:van:wpaper:0046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/econ/wparchive/index.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.