IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uwo/uwowop/9716.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Constant Risk Aversion, The Dual Theory, and the Gini Inequality Index

Author

Abstract

Constant risk aversion means that adding the same constant to all outcomes of two distributions, or multiplying all their outcomes by the same positive constant, will not change the preference relation between them. In this paper we prove several representation theorems, where constant risk aversion is combined with some other known axioms to imply specific functional forms. Among other things, we obtain a form of disappointment aversion theory without using the concept of reference point in the axioms and a form of the rank dependent modelwithout making any reference to the ranking of the outcomes. This axiomatization leads to a natural generalization of the Gini inequality index. Our analysis also establishes a connection between constant risk aversion. Frechet differentiability, and orders of risk aversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Safra, Zvi & Segal, Uzi, 1997. "Constant Risk Aversion, The Dual Theory, and the Gini Inequality Index," University of Western Ontario, Departmental Research Report Series 9716, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwo:uwowop:9716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1316&context=economicsresrpt
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    RISK; ECONOMIC THEORY;

    JEL classification:

    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwo:uwowop:9716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://economics.uwo.ca/research/research_papers/department_working_papers.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.