Andrew Mearman () (Department of Economics, University of the West of England, UK) Tim Wakeley (Griffith University, Australia) Gamila Shoib (Griffith University, Australia) Don J. Webber (Department of Business Economics, Auckland University of Technology and Department of Economics, UWE, Bristol)
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
This paper contributes to the debate on pluralism in the Economics curriculum. Here pluralism means a diversity of theoretical perspectives. One set of pedagogical arguments for pluralism are those found in ‘liberal’ philosophy of education. To this end, the first part of the paper presents arguments for pluralism based on ‘liberal’ pedagogical arguments. The paper also notes more instrumental arguments for pluralism; and barriers to such an approach. Finally, the paper considers new primary evidence from focus groups on student perceptions of economics. This evidence shows support for the arguments that a pluralist curriculum is popular and develops cognitive capacities of criticism, comparison and analysis – exactly those argued for in (liberal) pedagogical discussion – as well as judgement, understanding and writing skills. However, pluralism as a teaching strategy may be more difficult for those delivering it.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of the West of England, Department of Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number
0916.
Find related papers by JEL classification: A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology B5 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: