Compliance Bias in Dichotomous Choice CVM: Some Evidence From a Utah Wilderness Study
AbstractResponses to a dichotomous choice contingent valuation (DCCV) of wilderness designation in Utah were used to determine if individuals who identified themselves as having no opinion or being neutral to wilderness designation in general and for two specific wilderness proposals would have nonnegative willingness to pay for such designation. In cases for which a sufficient number of observations permitted estimation, the estimated willingness to pay was positive and significantly different from zero and often exceeded that of individuals who identified themselves as supporting wilderness designation. This appears to support the contention that DCCV studies may generate values from respondents whether or not those respondents truly have positive willingness to pay.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Utah State University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 9627.
Length: 16 pages
Date of creation: Jul 1996
Date of revision:
Other versions of this item:
- Keith, John E. & Fawson, Christopher B., 1996. "Compliance Bias In Dichotomous Choice Cvm: Some Evidence From A Utah Wilderness Study," Economics Research Institute, ERI Study Papers 28359, Utah State University, Economics Department.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John Gilbert).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.