Granger and Sims non-causality (GSNC) are compared to non-causality based on concepts popular in the microeconometrics and programme evaluation literature (potential outcome non-causality, PONC). GSNC is defined as a set of restrictions on joint distributions of random variables with observable sample counterparts, whereas PONC combines restrictions on partially unobservable variables (potential outcomes) with different identifying assumptions that relate potential to observable outcomes. Based on a dynamic model of potential outcomes, we find that in general neither of the concepts implies each other without further assumptions. However, identifying assumptions of the sequential selection on observable type provide the link between those concepts, such that GSNC implies PONC, and vice versa.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Jaap Abbring & James Heckman, 2008.
"Dynamic policy analysis,"
CeMMAP working papers
CWP05/08, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
[Downloadable!]
Florens, Jean-Pierre & Mouchart, Michel, 1985.
"A Linear Theory for Noncausality,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 53(1), pages 157-75, January.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Engle, Robert F & Hendry, David F & Richard, Jean-Francois, 1983.
"Exogeneity,"
Econometrica,
Econometric Society, vol. 51(2), pages 277-304, March.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: