In social science the concept of ‘institution’ plays a very important role. There are, however, significant differences in the way the concept is interpreted by the different schools of thought. Within economics is a divide between Original Institutional Economics and New Institutional Economics. Within sociology the Classical Sociology approaches the concept differently compared with the way Micro-Sociology is interpreting it. Serious methodological differences make a fruitful confrontation between the different approaches almost impossible. This paper shows that a methodological synthesis is possible. The method of isolated abstraction, as applied by orthodox economics has the potential to offer a synthesis by adding social and psychic logic to the analysis of economic logic. Moreover, the application of methodological institutionalism can overcome the divide between the typical micro and the typical macro methodology.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Utrecht School of Economics in its series Working Papers with number
07-25.
Find related papers by JEL classification: B10 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - General B20 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - General B40 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - General B50 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports: