The economic case for trade liberalization rests on its capacity to extend the reach of the market's fabled invisible hand. With the globalization of the market, however, comes a globalization of market failures arising from the fact that prices do not to capture 'external' costs and benefits to third parties. Whether the social gains from trade liberalization will exceed the social losses from the attendant market failures is an empirical question, one which cannot be answered by theoretical fables. This essay considers the impact of two types of trade-driven market failures on sustainable agriculture. The first is the displacement of natural fibres by synthetic substitutes, illustrated by the competition between jute and polypropylene. The second is the erosion of crop genetic diversity, illustrated by the impact of NAFTA on campesino maize farming in Mexico. In both cases, ‘free trade’ pits pits environmentally ‘clean’ production in the global South against ‘dirty’ production in the North - the opposite of the what is often assumed in discussions of the environmental impacts of North-South trade.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst in its series Published Studies with number
ps3.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Judy Fogg).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: