Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Unanticipated vs. Anticipated Tax Reforms in a Two-Sector Open Economy

Contents:

Author Info

  • Olivier Cardi
  • Romain Restout

Abstract

We use a two-sector neoclassical open economy model with traded and non-traded goods to investigate the effects of unanticipated and anticipated tax reforms. First, an unanticipated tax reform produces an expansion of GDP, labor, and investment, while an anticipated tax reform has opposite effects before the implementation of the labor tax cut. Quantitatively, if the traded sector is more capital intensive, GDP increases by 1.6 percentage points or declines by 2.8 percentage points after three years, depending on whether the tax cut is unanticipated or anticipated. Second, we find that GDP change masks a wide dispersion in sectoral output responses. Importantly, in all scenarios, a tax reform substantially raises the relative size of the non-traded sector while traded output always drops. Allowing for the markup to depend on the number of competitors, we find that a significant share of GDP change can be attributed to the competition channel while the dispersion of sectoral output responses is amplified. Finally, the workers only benefit from the labor tax cut if the tax change is unanticipated and the traded sector is more capital intensive.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.beta-umr7522.fr/productions/publications/2012/2012-01.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg in its series Working Papers of BETA with number 2012-01.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 2012
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2012-01

Contact details of provider:
Postal: PEGE. 61, Aven. de la Forêt-Noire 67000 Strasbourg
Phone: +33 3 68 85 20 69
Fax: +33 3 68 85 20 70
Email:
Web page: http://www.beta-umr7522.fr/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Non Traded Goods; Investment; Tax Reform; Anticipation effects.;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Perotti, Roberto, 2011. "The Effects of Tax Shocks on Output: Not So Large, But Not Small Either," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 8252, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  2. Mendoza, Enrique G & Tesar, Linda L, 1998. "The International Ramifications of Tax Reforms: Supply-Side Economics in a Global Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 88(1), pages 226-45, March.
  3. Karel Mertens & Morten Ravn, 2010. "Empirical Evidence on the Aggregate Effects of Anticipated and Unanticipated U.S. Tax Policy Shocks," NBER Working Papers 16289, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. Alan C. Stockman & Linda L. Tesar, 1991. "Tastes and technology in a two-country model of the business cycle: explaining international co-movements," Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 9019, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
  5. Carlo Favero & Francesco Giavazzi, 2012. "Measuring Tax Multipliers: The Narrative Method in Fiscal VARs," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 4(2), pages 69-94, May.
  6. Langot, François & Patureau, Lise & Sopraseuth, Thepthida, 2012. "Optimal Fiscal Devaluation," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb), CEPREMAP 1202, CEPREMAP.
  7. Agustín Bénétrix & Philip Lane, 2010. "Fiscal Shocks and The Sectoral Composition of Output," Open Economies Review, Springer, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 335-350, July.
  8. Javier Coto-Martínez & Huw D. Dixon, 2001. "Profits, Markups and Entry: Fiscal Policy in an Open Economy," CESifo Working Paper Series, CESifo Group Munich 550, CESifo Group Munich.
  9. Olivier Cardi & Romain Restout, 2012. "Unanticipated vs. Anticipated Tax Reforms in a Two-Sector Open Economy," Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg 2012-01, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  10. Peter Pedroni, 2001. "Purchasing Power Parity Tests In Cointegrated Panels," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(4), pages 727-731, November.
  11. Roberto Perotti, 2011. "The Effects of Tax Shocks on Output: Not So Large, But Not Small Either," NBER Working Papers 16786, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  12. Coenen, Günter & McAdam, Peter & Straub, Roland, 2008. "Tax reform and labour-market performance in the euro area: A simulation-based analysis using the New Area-Wide Model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 2543-2583, August.
  13. James Cloyne, 2013. "Discretionary Tax Changes and the Macroeconomy: New Narrative Evidence from the United Kingdom," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 103(4), pages 1507-28, June.
  14. Reuven Glick & Kenneth Rogoff, 1993. "Global Versus Country-Specific Productivity Shocks and the Current Acocount," Boston University - Institute for Economic Development, Boston University, Institute for Economic Development 31, Boston University, Institute for Economic Development.
  15. Baxter, Marianne & King, Robert G, 1993. "Fiscal Policy in General Equilibrium," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 83(3), pages 315-34, June.
  16. Christina D. Romer & David H. Romer, 2010. "The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 763-801, June.
  17. Christopher L. House & Matthew D. Shapiro, 2004. "Phased-In Tax Cuts and Economic Activity," NBER Working Papers 10415, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  18. Karlygash Kuralbayeva & David Vines, 2008. "Shocks to Terms of Trade and Risk-premium in an Intertemporal Model: The Dutch Disease and a Dutch Party," Open Economies Review, Springer, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 277-303, July.
  19. Nir Jaimovich, 2004. "Firm Dynamics, Markup Variations, and the Business Cycle," Discussion Papers, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research 07-013, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, revised Mar 2007.
  20. Robert E. Lucas Jr., 2003. "Macroeconomic Priorities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 1-14, March.
  21. Valerie Cerra & Serpil Tekin & Stephen Turnovsky, 2009. "Foreign Transfers and Real Exchange Rate Adjustments in a Financially Constrained Dependent Economy," Open Economies Review, Springer, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 147-181, April.
  22. Filippo Altissimo & Pierpaolo Benigno & Diego Palenzuela, 2011. "Inflation Differentials in a Currency Area: Facts, Explanations and Policy," Open Economies Review, Springer, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 189-233, April.
  23. Turnovsky Stephen J. & Sen Partha, 1995. "Investment in a Two-Sector Dependent Economy," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 29-55, March.
  24. Atolia, Manoj & Buffie, Edward F., 2011. "Solving The Unit Root Problem In Models With An Exogenous World Market Interest Rate," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(05), pages 681-712, November.
  25. Wu, Yangru & Zhang, Junxi, 2000. "Endogenous markups and the effects of income taxation:: Theory and evidence from OECD countries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 383-406, September.
  26. Mankiw, N Gregory & Rotemberg, Julio J & Summers, Lawrence H, 1985. "Intertemporal Substitution in Macroeconomics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 100(1), pages 225-51, February.
  27. Alan J Auerbach, 2011. "Long-term fiscal sustainability in major economies," BIS Working Papers, Bank for International Settlements 361, Bank for International Settlements.
  28. Petrucci, Alberto & Phelps, Edmund S., 2009. "Two-sector perspectives on the effects of payroll tax cuts and their financing," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 93(1-2), pages 176-190, February.
  29. Schubert, Stefan F & Turnovsky, Stephen J, 2002. "The Dynamics of Temporary Policies in a Small Open Economy," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(4), pages 604-22, November.
  30. Susan Yang, Shu-Chun, 2005. "Quantifying tax effects under policy foresight," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 52(8), pages 1557-1568, November.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Olivier Cardi & Romain Restout, 2012. "Unanticipated vs. Anticipated Tax Reforms in a Two-Sector Open Economy," Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg 2012-01, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  2. Amélie Barbier-Gauchard & Francesco De Palma & Giuseppe Diana, 2012. "Currency devaluation with dual labor market : Which perspectives for the Euro Zone ?," Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg 2012-04, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  3. Olivier Cardi & Romain Restout, 2012. "Fiscal shocks in a two sector open economy with endogenous markups," Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg 2012-17, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  4. Ragip Ege & Herrade Igersheim & Charlotte Le Chapelain, 2012. "Transcendental vs. Comparative Approaches to Justice : A Reappraisal of Sen’s Dichotomy," Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg 2012-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  5. Patrick Cohendet & Patrick Llerena & Laurent Simon, 2012. "THE ROUTINIZATION OF CREATIVITY: Lessons from the Case of a video-game Creative Powerhouse," Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg 2012-05, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  6. Raphaële Préget & Phu Nguyen-Van & Marc Willinger, 2012. "Who are the Voluntary Leaders? Experimental Evidence from a Sequential Contribution Game," Working Papers, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier 12-34, LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier, revised Nov 2012.
  7. Julien Pénin, 2012. "Motivation crowding-out: Is there a risk for science?," Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg 2012-13, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
  8. Meixing Dai, 2012. "Static and Dynamic Effects of Central Bank Transparency," Working Papers of BETA, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg 2012-08, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2012-01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.