Skill formation among vocational rehabilitation clients - public policy vs private incentives
AbstractIn this paper we analyse individual vocational rehabilitation clients’ decisions to enter active training or not. Although the Government pays the direct costs of training, the composition of the total costs of training may be decisive for individual choices. Based on labour market theory, we relate background characteristics of the clients to monetary opportunity costs and non-monetary costs of training, arguing that training choices are a consequence of differences in costs of training. We use a ten percent sample of participants in educational programs, work related training and non-participants who entered the Norwegian vocational rehabilitation sector in the period from 1989 to 1993, a total of 6653 persons. We find that the background characteristics of persons investing in educational training differ along several dimensions compared both to persons attending work related training and to clients not participating in training at all.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Department of Economics, University of Bergen in its series Working paper Series with number 0201.
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: 2002
Date of revision:
public policy; private incentives; costs of training; educational training; work related training; vocational rehabilitation;
Other versions of this item:
- Arild Aakvik & Egil Kjerstad, 2003. "Skill formation among vocational rehabilitation clients - public policy vs private incentives," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 219-237.
- Aakvik, Arild & Kjerstad, Egil, 2002. "Skill Formation among Vocational Rehabilitation Clients – Public Policy vs Private Incentives," Working Papers in Economics 01/02, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
- C25 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions
- H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
- I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2002-06-13 (All new papers)
- NEP-DCM-2002-06-13 (Discrete Choice Models)
- NEP-HEA-2002-06-13 (Health Economics)
- NEP-LAB-2002-06-13 (Labour Economics)
- NEP-MIC-2002-06-17 (Microeconomics)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bjørn Sandvik).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.