Food Subsides, Growth and Poverty A Critique on Neoliberal Institutional Structure
AbstractThe relationship among payment style of subsidies, economic growth and poverty is a matter of challenge among economists and policy makers. Neoliberal Institutional Structure in framework of what is called â€œWashington Consensusâ€ and â€œstructural adjustment policies and economic stabilizationâ€ argues on economic advantages of removing food general subsidies so necessity of replacing a most liberalized food markets with regulated food security policy. This paper gives a historical background of this approach and criticizes itâ€™s policy recommendation and shows following it has led to a deep crisis in global food market in 2007 with sharply rising of poverty and dying of some people around the world due to lacking of access to food.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 200912.
Length: 14 pages
Date of creation: Oct 2009
Date of revision: Oct 2009
Subsidies; adjustment and stabilization policies; poverty; food Crisis;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kelvin Mac).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.